Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36092770›Full record

ArticleSSM. Qualitative research in health2022

Long covid and medical gaslighting: Dismissal, delayed diagnosis, and deferred treatment.

Larry Au, Cristian Capotescu, Gil Eyal, Gabrielle Finestone

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SSM. Qualitative research in health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 80 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
80citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
26.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

80 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 156 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Women's musculoskeletal health: insights from the 2024 National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine report on chronic conditions.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Gaslighting in the context of diagnostic safety: A concept analysis.Journal of healthcare risk management : the journal of the American Society for Healthcare Risk Management · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Barriers to Long COVID Care in the U.S.: An Application of Levesque et al.'s Access Framework.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Vital yet Fragile: Informal Networks of Support Among Young People Navigating Long Covid.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  18. Long COVID disability burden in US adults.Communications medicine · 2026
    Article
  19. Medical Gaslighting and its Impact on Vulnerable Populations.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2026
    Article
  20. Article

20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Larry AuDepartment of Sociology, The City College of New York, NAC 6/135, 160 Convent Ave, New York, NY, 10031, USA.
Cristian CapotescuInterdisciplinary Center for Innovative Theory and Empirics, Columbia University, Suite 1300, 61 Claremont Avenue, New York, NY, 10115, USA.
Gil EyalDepartment of Sociology, Columbia University, Suite 501, 606 W 122nd St, New York, NY, 10027, USA.
Gabrielle FinestoneDepartment of Sociology, Columbia University, Suite 501, 606 W 122nd St, New York, NY, 10027, USA.
Columbia University · USCity College of New York · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While we know a lot more about Long Covid today, patients who were infected with Covid-19 early on in the pandemic and developed Long Covid had to contend with medical professionals who lacked awareness of the potential for extended complications from Covid-19. Long Covid patients have responded by labeling their contentious interactions with medical professionals, organizations, and the broader medical system as "gaslighting." We argue that the charge of medical gaslighting can be understood as a form of ontological politics. Not only do patients demand that their version of reality be recognized, but they also blame the experts who hold gatekeeping power over their medical care for producing a distorted version of said reality. By analyzing results from an online survey of Long Covid patients active on social media in the United States (n ​= ​334), we find that experiences of contention and their reframing as "gaslighting" were common amongst our respondents. In short answer responses about their experience obtaining medical care for Long Covid, our respondents described encountering medical professionals who dismissed their experience, leading to lengthy diagnostic odysseys and lack of treatment options for Long Covid. Even though we are limited by characteristics of our sample, there is good reason to believe that these experiences and their contentious reframing as medical gaslighting are exacerbated by gender, class, and racial inequalities.

Indexed as

Chronic illnessDiagnostic odysseyGaslightingLong covidPatient-physician relationship

Identifiers

PMID36092770
PMCPMC9448633
OpenAlexW4295512907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.