ArticleProceedings of the ... AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
Knowledge Distillation via Constrained Variational Inference.
Article in Proceedings of the ... AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Switching State Space Modeling via Constrained Inference for Clinical Outcome Prediction.Proceedings of machine learning research · 2025Article
- Data free knowledge distillation with feature synthesis and spatial consistency for image analysis.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Knowledge distillation has been used to capture the knowledge of a teacher model and distill it into a student model with some desirable characteristics such as being smaller, more efficient, or more generalizable. In this paper, we propose a framework for distilling the knowledge of a powerful discriminative model such as a neural network into commonly used graphical models known to be more interpretable (e.g., topic models, autoregressive Hidden Markov Models). Posterior of latent variables in these graphical models (e.g., topic proportions in topic models) is often used as feature representation for predictive tasks. However, these posterior-derived features are known to have poor predictive performance compared to the features learned via purely discriminative approaches. Our framework constrains variational inference for posterior variables in graphical models with a similarity preserving constraint. This constraint distills the knowledge of the discriminative model into the graphical model by ensuring that input pairs with (dis)similar representation in the teacher model also have (dis)similar representation in the student model. By adding this constraint to the variational inference scheme, we guide the graphical model to be a reasonable density model for the data while having predictive features which are as close as possible to those of a discriminative model. To make our framework applicable to a wide range of graphical models, we build upon the Automatic Differentiation Variational Inference (ADVI), a black-box inference framework for graphical models. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our framework on two real-world tasks of disease subtyping and disease trajectory modeling.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.