Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36092749›Full record

ArticleJamba (Potchefstroom, South Africa)2022

Rural vulnerability and institutional dynamics in the context of COVID-19: A scoping review.

Sokfa F John, Andrew E Okem, Betty C Mubangizi, Niyi Adekanla, Londeka P Ngubane, Ibrahima Barry

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Jamba (Potchefstroom, South Africa), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. An overview of Volume 14, No 1 (2022).Jamba (Potchefstroom, South Africa) · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Sokfa F JohnNRF/SARChI in Sustainable Rural Livelihoods, School of Management, IT and Governance, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-0358-1026
Andrew E OkemSchool of Life Sciences, College of Agriculture, Engineering and Science, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5449-7639
Betty C MubangiziNRF/SARChI in Sustainable Rural Livelihoods, School of Management, IT and Governance, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0774-7193
Niyi AdekanlaAIDLINE Research Consult, Lagos, Nigeria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5103-5241
Londeka P NgubaneDepartment of Criminology and Forensic Studies, School of Applied Human Sciences, College of Humanities, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6978-2026
Ibrahima BarryLEMNA (University of Nantes) and ONIRIS, Nantes, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7140-8826
University of KwaZulu-Natal · ZAIntergovernmental Panel on Climate Change · CHOniris · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study reviewed the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on pre-existing vulnerabilities in rural communities using the scoping review strategy. It focused on manuscripts published on the topic in 2020. Based on 39 studies that met our inclusion criteria (out of 507 studies), we note that COVID-19 is exacerbating pre-existing rural vulnerabilities, including poverty, remoteness, socio-economic marginalisation and high unemployment. There is limited evidence that rural communities are resilient to the pandemic. Reduction in household expenditures and the community food system are the only reported forms of resilience. Although local institutions are supporting rural communities in responding to the impacts of the pandemic, several institutional dynamics undermine the effectiveness of the response. The increased risk of the pandemic is likely to reduce incomes and standards of living amongst poor communities. Thus, coping strategies were identified such as starting small gardens in communities, diet changes, targeting community markets with produce rather than retailers and food swap using social media, with food swap being the most adopted coping strategy. Although this study does not offer a comprehensive picture of the levels and nature of vulnerability, resilience and institutional dynamics of rural communities in different parts of the world reveal the limitations of existing knowledge of the vulnerability of rural communities in the context of COVID-19. This underscores the importance of further studies on rural vulnerability in the context of COVID-19 that will enable evidence-based responses to the pandemic in rural contexts.

Indexed as

adaptive capacityCOVID-19livelihoodsresilienceruralvulnerability

Identifiers

PMID36092749
PMCPMC9453141
OpenAlexW4294276220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.