ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering2018
Technical Note: Known-Component Registration for Robotic Drill Guide Positioning.
Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
A method for x-ray-guided robotic positioning of surgical instruments is reported and evaluated in preclinical studies of spine pedicle screw placement with the aim of improving delivery of transpedicle drills and screws. The known-component registration (KC-Reg) algorithm was used to register the 3D patient CT and the surface model of a drill guide to intraoperatively acquired 2D radiographs. Resulting transformations, combined with offline hand-eye calibration, drive a robotically-held drill guide to target trajectories established in the preoperative patient CT. The proposed method was assessed against more conventional surgical tracker guidance, and robustness to clinically realistic errors was tested in phantom and cadaver studies. Target registration error (TRE) was computed as drill guide deviation from the planned trajectory. The KC-Reg approach resulted in 1.51 ± 0.51 mm error at tooltip and 1.01 ± 0.92° in approach angle, showing comparable performance to the tracker-guided approach. In cadaver studies with anatomical deformation, TRE of 2.31 ± 1.05 mm and 0.66 ± 0.62° were observed, with statistically improved performance over a surgical tracker through registration of locally rigid bony anatomy. X-ray guidance offers an accurate means of driving robotic systems that is compatible with conventional fluoroscopic workflow. Specifically, such procedures involve multi-planar fluoroscopic views that are qualitatively interpreted by the surgeon; the KC-Reg approach accomplishes this using the same multi-planar views to provide greater quantitative accuracy and valuable guidance and QA. The method was robust against anatomical deformation due to the radiographic scene's local nature used in registration, presenting a potentially major surgical benefit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.