Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36092691›Full record

ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2022

Development and design of a diagnostic report to support communication in dementia: Co-creation with patients and care partners.

Aniek M van Gils, Leonie N C Visser, Heleen M A Hendriksen, Jean Georges, Wiesje M van der Flier, Hanneke F M Rhodius-Meester

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Amyloid PET disclosure in subjective cognitive decline: Patient experiences over time.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The expectations and experiences of patients regarding the diagnostic workup at a specialized memory clinic: An interview study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Biomarker disclosure protocols in prodromal Alzheimer's disease clinical trials.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Aniek M van GilsAlzheimer Center Amsterdam Neurology Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc Amsterdam The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0669-2584
Leonie N C VisserAlzheimer Center Amsterdam Neurology Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc Amsterdam The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3487-7938
Heleen M A HendriksenAlzheimer Center Amsterdam Neurology Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc Amsterdam The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4040-6959
Jean GeorgesAlzheimer Europe Luxembourg Luxembourg.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4862-3031
Wiesje M van der FlierAlzheimer Center Amsterdam Neurology Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc Amsterdam The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8766-6224
Hanneke F M Rhodius-MeesterAlzheimer Center Amsterdam Neurology Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc Amsterdam The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6476-4670

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Clear communication of diagnostic test results and dementia diagnosis is challenging yet important to empower patients and care partners. A personalized diagnostic report could support the communication of dementia diagnostics and aid patients' understanding of diagnosis. In this study, we aimed to design a diagnostic report in co-creation with patients and care partners. Methods: We used a mixed-methods approach, combining surveys with focus groups in iteration. Phase 1 consisted of an international survey assessing needs among patients ( Results: Most patients (39/50, 78%) and care partners (38/46, 83%) positively valued a diagnostic report to summarize test results. The report should be brief, straightforward, and comprise results of the diagnostic tests, including brain imaging and information on future expectations. Despite a clear preference for visual display of test results, several visualization options were deemed best and were equally comprehended. Discussion: In this study, we developed a prototype of a personalized patient report through an iterative design process and learned that co-creation is highly valuable to meet the specific needs of end-users.

Indexed as

brain imagingcommunicationdementiadiagnosisdiagnostic testingneuropsychologypreventionprognosisprogression

Identifiers

PMID36092691
PMCPMC9446898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.