Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36092642›Full record

ArticleMultiple sclerosis journal - experimental, translational and clinical

Fingolimod versus interferon beta 1-a: Benefit-harm assessment approach based on TRANSFORMS individual patient data.

Alessandra Spanu, Hélène E Aschmann, Jürg Kesselring, Milo A Puhan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Multiple sclerosis journal - experimental, translational and clinical. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 84% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Alessandra SpanuEpidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7790-6407
Hélène E AschmannEpidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1234-4321
Jürg KesselringRehaKliniken Valens, Valens, Switzerland.
Milo A PuhanEpidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
University of Zurich · CHUniversity of California, San Francisco · USValens Clinics · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Fingolimod is a disease-modifying drug approved for multiple sclerosis but its benefit-harm balance has never been assessed compared to other active treatments. Objectives: Our aim was to compare the benefits and harms of fingolimod with interferon beta-1a using individual patient data from TRial Assessing injectable interferon versus FTY720 Oral in RRMS trial. Methods: We modelled the health status of patients over time including Expanded Disability Status Scale measurements, relapses and any adverse events. We assessed the mean health status between arms and the proportion of patients whose health deteriorated or improved relatively to baseline, using a prespecified minimal important difference of 4.6. We performed sensitivity analyses to test our assumptions. Results: Main and sensitivity analyses favoured fingolimod 0.5 mg over interferon beta-1a. The average health status difference was 1.01 (95% CI 0.93-1.08). Patients on fingolimod 0.5 mg were 0.47 (95% CI: 0.35-0.63, Conclusions: Fingolimod's net benefit over interferon beta-1a did not reach the clinical relevance over 1 year, but the decreased risk for health status deterioration may be more pronounced more long term and patients may prefer less treatment burden associated with fingolimod.

Indexed as

adverse eventsBenefit–harm assessmentfingolimodhealth statusinterferon beta-1amultiple sclerosis

Identifiers

PMID36092642
PMCPMC9459487
OpenAlexW4294934276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.