ArticleACS omega2022
Structure and Dynamics of the Isozymes II and IX of Human Carbonic Anhydrase.
Article in ACS omega, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Real-Time Binding Kinetics of Small Molecules to CA IX in Live Suspension Cells Using SPR Microscopy.ACS medicinal chemistry letters · 2026Article
- Acidic Tumor Microenvironments and Emerging Therapeutic Strategies for Cancer Therapy.Yonsei medical journal · 2025Review
- Computational insights into novel inhibitors: virtual screening of small molecules against human carbonic anhydrase II.Frontiers in chemistry · 2025Article
- Design and synthesis of novel coumarin-benzimidazole hybrids as human galectin-1 inhibitors.Future medicinal chemistry · 2024Article
- Energetics and dynamics of the proton shuttle of carbonic anhydrase II.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human carbonic anhydrases (HCAs) are responsible for the pH control and sensing in our body and constitute key components in the central pH paradigm connected to cancer therapeutics. However, little or no molecular level studies are available on the pH-dependent stability and functional dynamics of the known isozymes of HCA. The main objective of this Article is to report the first bench-marking study on the structure and dynamics of the two most efficient isozymes, HCA II and IX, at neutral pH using classical molecular dynamics (MD) and constant pH MD (CpHMD) simulations combined with umbrella sampling, transition path sampling, and Markov state models. Starting from the known crystal structures of HCA II and the monomeric catalytic domain of HCA IX (labeled as HCA IX-c), we have generated classical MD and CpHMD trajectories (of length 1 μs each). In all cases, the overall stability, RMSD, and secondary structure segments of the two isozymes are found to be quite similar. Functionally important dynamics of these two enzymes have been probed in terms of active site hydration, coordination of the Zn(II) ion to a transient excess water, and the formation of putative proton transfer paths. The most important difference between the two isozymes is observed for the side-chain fluctuations of His-64 that is expected to shuttle an excess proton out of the active site as a part of the rate-determining intramolecular proton transfer reaction. The relative stability of the stable inward and outward conformations of the His-64 side-chain and the underlying free energy surfaces are found to depend strongly on the isozyme. In each case, a lower free energy barrier is detected between predominantly inward conformations from predominantly outward ones when simulated under constant pH conditions. The kinetic rate constants of interconversion between different free energy basins are found to span 10
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.