Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36092542›Full record

ArticleJournal of exercise science and fitness2022

Countermovement jump, handgrip, and balance performance change during euhydration, mild-dehydration, rehydration, and ad libitum drinking.

Yasuki Sekiguchi, Gabrielle E W Giersch, Danielle R Jordan, Leslie Dunn, Aidan Fiol, Virgilio Lopez, Lawrence E Armstrong, Douglas J Casa, Elaine C Lee

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of exercise science and fitness, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yasuki SekiguchiHuman Performance Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA.
Gabrielle E W GierschHuman Performance Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA.
Danielle R JordanHuman Performance Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA.
Leslie DunnHuman Performance Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA.
Aidan FiolHuman Performance Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA.
Virgilio LopezHuman Performance Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA.
Lawrence E ArmstrongHuman Performance Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA.
Douglas J CasaHuman Performance Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA.
Elaine C LeeHuman Performance Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To examine the effects of euhydration, mild-dehydration, rehydration, and ad libitum drinking on countermovement jump (CMJ), handgrip strength, and performance of balance error scoring system test (BESS). Methods: Eighteen healthy male subjects (mean[M]±standard deviation[SD]; age, 23±3y; body mass, 80.1 ± 9.7 kg; height, 175.8 ± 5.7 cm) participated in this study. Participants reported to the laboratory to perform CMJ, handgrip strength, and BESS with different hydration statuses (euhydrated, EUH; when they initially sensed thirst, THIRST; dehydrated, DEH; following 30 minutes of rehydration, REH; and following 24-h ad libitum drinking, AD). Results: CMJ at EUH (M±SD; 54.6 ± 3.0 cm) was significantly higher than DEH (52.8 ± 3.0 cm, p = 0.027) and REH (52.6 ± 2.8 cm, p < 0.001). However, there was no difference between DEH and REH (p = 0.643). CMJ at THIRST (54.9 ± 3.0 cm, p = 0.004) was higher than REH. Also, AD (53.8 ± 2.8 cm, p = 0.027) was higher than REH. In left handgrip strength, THIRST (48.6 ± 9.5 kg) was higher than EUH (46.7 ± 10.1 kg, p = 0.018), DEH (45.8 ± 10.0 kg, p = 0.013), REH (46.1 ± 9.5 kg, p = 0.004), and AD (47.1 ± 9.7 kg, p = 0.05). Additionally, in the single-leg stance on a foam pad, more BESS errors were found at THIRST (6 ± 2) compared to EUH (5 ± 2, p = 0.007) and AD (5 ± 2, p = 0.002). Conclusion: The findings of this study were: ∼2% of mild dehydration induced by 24-h fluid restriction decreased lower body power measured by CMJ, acute rehydration did not restore the loss of lower body power induced by dehydration, and ∼0.5-0.9% of dehydration did not decrease lower body power.

Indexed as

DehydrationFluid intakePerformanceRecovery

Identifiers

PMID36092542
PMCPMC9418909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.