Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36092461›Full record

ArticleProceedings of machine learning research2021

LassoNet: Neural Networks with Feature Sparsity.

Ismael Lemhadri, Feng Ruan, Robert Tibshirani

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of machine learning research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Representation Retrieval Learning for Heterogeneous Data Integration.Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Sparse-Input Neural Network using Group Concave Regularization.Transactions on machine learning research · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ismael LemhadriStanford University.
Feng RuanStanford University.
Robert TibshiraniStanford University.
Stanford University · US

Funding

New Statistical Methods for Medical Signals and ImagesR01EB001988 · NIBIB · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI JOHNSTONE, IAIN M · 2003 to 2018
$6.1M
New Statistical Methods for Medical Signals and ImagesR01GM134483 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Iain M Johnstone · 2019 to 2026
$3.9M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB001988NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM134483
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Much work has been done recently to make neural networks more interpretable, and one approach is to arrange for the network to use only a subset of the available features. In linear models, Lasso (or

Identifiers

PMID36092461
PMCPMC9453696
OpenAlexW3172710683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.