ReviewJournal of oral biology and craniofacial research
Effect of various malocclusion on maximal bite force- a systematic review.
Review in Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Normative Data of Healthy Adults on the Test of Masticating and Swallowing Solids (ToMaSS) with Domestic Crackers.Dysphagia · 2026Article
- Occlusal force analysis with T-Scan and Innobyte in adult patients: a prospective study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Assessment of Orofacial Muscle Strength, Masticatory and Swallowing Function in Children Indicated for Orthodontic Treatment-A Preliminary Investigation.Journal of oral rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Three-dimensional evaluation of pulp chamber volume and dimensions across skeletal and dental malocclusions using CBCT: a retrospective cross-sectional study.Clinical oral investigations · 2025Review
- Exploring the Role of Oral Microbiota in the Pathophysiology and Treatment of Bruxism.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2025Review
- Effects of 3D-printers and manufacturer-specified post-curing units on the dimensional accuracy, compressive strength, and degree of conversion of resin for fixed dental prostheses.Journal of dental sciences · 2025Article
- [Characteristics of occlusal force and contact in 20 individual normal occlusion children with mixed dentition].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2025Article
- Shear Bond Strength of Simulated Single-Retainer Resin-Bonded Bridges Made of Four CAD/CAM Materials for Maxillary Lateral Incisor Agenesis Rehabilitation.European journal of dentistry · 2024Article
- Design and Implement Strategy of Wireless Bite Force Device.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Evaluation of masticatory function in the pediatric and adult populations with Treacher Collins syndrome.Journal of oral biology and craniofacial researchArticle
- Evaluation of stress distribution patterns produced with the Advansync2 class II corrector - A finite element analysis.Journal of oral biology and craniofacial researchArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This systematic review evaluates the variation in molar bite force (MBF) with the type and severity of dental malocclusion in young adults with permanent dentition. Methods: We searched seven electronic databases until December 31, 2021, and identified 1898 articles, of which 22 full-texts were reviewed. Eight clinical studies with subjects having permanent dentition with various dental malocclusions and quantifying maximal bite force were included for the review. Newcastle Ottawa scale was used to assess the risk of bias and GRADE to study the certainty of evidence. Articles were evaluated for the primary outcome (variation of MBF in different malocclusion groups) and confounding factors affecting MBF. Results: All studies measured MBF in individuals with normal and malocclusion, with 2329 subjects having permanent dentition. A positive correlation of Class I normal occlusion with the bite force was seen compared to Class II and III malocclusion. Unilateral crossbite patients had lesser bite force. Six studies with 1023 males and 1175 females showed MBF more in males than females. In 3 studies (332 subjects), no significant difference for MBF between the right and left sides of the jaws was measured. Conclusion: MBF decreases significantly with vertical and transverse craniofacial and dental discrepancy. Normal sagittal occlusion has more molar bite force than patients with different malocclusions. Also, MBF is more in males than females, and it increases with age. Registration: PROSPERO CRD42021249328.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.