ArticleHealth information science and systems2022
Autism screening: an unsupervised machine learning approach.
Article in Health information science and systems, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Revolutionizing diagnosis of pulmonaryFrontiers in microbiology · 2024Pooled it
- Compact subsets of autism screening items predict clinical diagnoses with a machine learning analysis of the QCHAT-10.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- An Adaptive Transfer Learning Framework for Multimodal Autism Spectrum Disorder Diagnosis.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Autism spectrum disorder detection with kNN imputer and machine learning classifiers via questionnaire mode of screening.Health information science and systems · 2024Article
- Linguistic summarization of visual attention and developmental functioning of young children with autism spectrum disorder.Health information science and systems · 2024Article
- Assessing Autistic Traits in Toddlers Using a Data-Driven Approach with DSM-5 Mapping.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early screening of autism spectrum disorders (ASD) is a key area of research in healthcare. Currently artificial intelligence (AI)-driven approaches are used to improve the process of autism diagnosis using computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) systems. One of the issues related to autism diagnosis and screening data is the reliance of the predictions primarily on scores provided by medical screening methods which can be biased depending on how the scores are calculated. We attempt to reduce this bias by assessing the performance of the predictions related to the screening process using a new model that consists of a Self-Organizing Map (SOM) with classification algorithms. The SOM is employed prior to the diagnostic process to derive a new class label using clusters learnt from the independent features; these clusters are related to communication, repetitive traits, and social traits in the input dataset. Then, the new clusters are compared with existing class labels in the dataset to refine and eliminate any inconsistencies. Lastly, the refined dataset is utilised to derive classification systems for autism diagnosis. The new model was evaluated against a real-life autism screening dataset that consists of over 2000 instances of cases and controls. The results based on the refined dataset show that the proposed method achieves significantly higher accuracy, precision, and recall for the classification models derived when compared to models derived from the original dataset.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.