ReviewFrontiers in plant science2022
The road to molecular identification and detection of fungal grapevine trunk diseases.
Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Rapid Recombinase Polymerase Amplification-CRISPR/Cas12a Assay for Detecting Grapevine Black-Foot Pathogens.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Microbial succession from nursery to vineyard highlights the role of beneficial and pathogenic microbes in young vineyard yield.Environmental microbiome · 2026Article
- Beyond Koch's postulates: the pathobiome paradigm in grapevine esca disease.FEMS microbiology ecology · 2026Review
- Microbiome composition in grapevine trunk diseases symptomatic plants is modulated by genotype and region.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Rhizobacteria from vineyard and commercial arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi induce synergistic microbiome shifts within grapevine root systems.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Advancing fungal phylogenetics: integrating modern sequencing, dark taxa discovery, and machine learning.Archives of microbiology · 2025Review
- Transcriptome profiling of symptomatic vs. asymptomatic grapevine plants reveals candidate genes for plant improvement against trunk diseases.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- High-Resolution Melting assays development for discrimination of fungal pathogens causing Grapevine Trunk Diseases.PloS one · 2025Article
- Impact of the Biocontrol Product, EsquiveJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Two Paenibacillus spp. strains promote grapevine wood degradation by the fungus Fomitiporia mediterranea: from degradation experiments to genome analyses.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Profiling Walnut Fungal Pathobiome Associated with Walnut Dieback Using Community-Targeted DNA Metabarcoding.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Metagenomic Study of Fungal Microbial Communities in Two PDO Somontano Vineyards (Huesca, Spain): Effects of Age, Plant Genotype, and Initial Phytosanitary Status on the Priming and Selection of their Associated Microorganisms.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- A TaqManBiology · 2023Article
- Editorial: Fungal pathogens causing the grapevine trunk diseases- biology and identification.Frontiers in fungal biology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Grapevine is regarded as a highly profitable culture, being well spread worldwide and mostly directed to the wine-producing industry. Practices to maintain the vineyard in healthy conditions are tenuous and are exacerbated due to abiotic and biotic stresses, where fungal grapevine trunk diseases (GTDs) play a major role. The abolishment of chemical treatments and the intensification of several management practices led to an uprise in GTD outbreaks. Symptomatology of GTDs is very similar among diseases, leading to underdevelopment of the vines and death in extreme scenarios. Disease progression is widely affected by biotic and abiotic factors, and the prevalence of the pathogens varies with country and region. In this review, the state-of-the-art regarding identification and detection of GTDs is vastly analyzed. Methods and protocols used for the identification of GTDs, which are currently rather limited, are highlighted. The main conclusion is the utter need for the development of new technologies to easily and precisely detect the presence of the pathogens related to GTDs, allowing to readily take phytosanitary measures and/or proceed to plant removal in order to establish better vineyard management practices. Moreover, new practices and methods of detection, identification, and quantification of infectious material would allow imposing greater control on nurseries and plant exportation, limiting the movement of infected vines and thus avoiding the propagation of fungal inoculum throughout wine regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.