ArticleJRSM cardiovascular disease
Cardiovascular waveforms - can we extract more from routine signals?
Article in JRSM cardiovascular disease. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiovascular waveforms such as blood pressure, ECG and photoplethysmography (PPG), are routinely acquired by specialised monitoring devices. Such devices include bedside monitors, wearables and radiotelemetry which sample at very high fidelity, yet most of this numerical data is disregarded and focus tends to reside on single point averages such as the maxima, minima, amplitude, rate and intervals. Whilst, these measures are undoubtedly of value, we may be missing important information by simplifying the complex waveform signal in this way. This Special Collection showcases recent advances in the appraisal of routine signals. Ultimately, such approaches and technologies may assist in improving the accuracy and sensitivity of detecting physiological change. This, in turn, may assist with identifying efficacy or safety signals for investigational new drugs or aidpatient diagnosis and management, supporting scientific and clinical decision making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.