Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36092368›Full record

ReviewMolecular therapy. Methods & clinical development2022

Immunogenicity assessment of AAV-based gene therapies: An IQ consortium industry white paper.

Tong-Yuan Yang, Manuela Braun, Wibke Lembke, Fraser McBlane, John Kamerud, Stephen DeWall, Edit Tarcsa, Xiaodong Fang, Lena Hofer, Uma Kavita and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
18.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 110 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Immunogenicity of Gene and Cell Therapies.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2026
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 14 institutions in 4 countries.

Tong-Yuan YangJanssen R&D LLC, Spring House, PA 19477, USA.
Manuela BraunBayer AG, Pharmaceuticals R&D, Berlin 13342, Germany.
Wibke LembkeUCB Farchim SA, Bulle 1630, Switzerland.
Fraser McBlaneNovartis, Basel 4056, Switzerland.
John KamerudPfizer BioMedicine Design, Andover, MA 01810, USA.
Stephen DeWallPassage Bio, Philadelphia, PA 19103, USA.
Edit TarcsaAbbvie Bioresearch Center, Worcester, MA 01605, USA.
Xiaodong FangAsklepios BioPharmaceuticals, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA.
Lena HoferSpark Therapeutics Inc, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Uma KavitaSpark Therapeutics Inc, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Vijay V UpretiAmgen Inc, South San Francisco, CA 94080, USA.
Swati GuptaAbbVie, Irvine, CA 92612, USA.
LiNa LooVertex Pharmaceuticals, Boston, MA 02210, USA.
Alison J JohnsonBoehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ridgefield, CT 06877, USA.
Rakesh Kantilal ChandodeAstraZeneca, Gothenburg 43250, Sweden.
Kay-Gunnar StubenrauchRoche Pharma Research and Early Development, Penzberg 82377, Germany.
Maya VinzingBayer AG, Pharmaceuticals R&D, Berlin 13342, Germany.
Cindy Q XiaTakeda Pharmaceuticals International Co, Boston, MA 02139, USA.
Vibha JawaBristol Myers Squibb, Lawrence Township, NJ 08648, USA.
AbbVie (United States) · USBayer (Germany) · DESpark Therapeutics (United States) · USAmgen (United States) · USAstraZeneca (Sweden) · SEBoehringer Ingelheim (United States) · USBristol-Myers Squibb (United States) · USJanssen (United States) · USNovartis (Switzerland) · CHPfizer (United States) · USRoche Pharma AG (Germany) · DETakeda (United States) · USTriangle · USVertex Pharmaceuticals (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immunogenicity has imposed a challenge to efficacy and safety evaluation of adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector-based gene therapies. Mild to severe adverse events observed in clinical development have been implicated with host immune responses against AAV gene therapies, resulting in comprehensive evaluation of immunogenicity during nonclinical and clinical studies mandated by health authorities. Immunogenicity of AAV gene therapies is complex due to the number of risk factors associated with product components and pre-existing immunity in human subjects. Different clinical mitigation strategies have been employed to alleviate treatment-induced or -boosted immunogenicity in order to achieve desired efficacy, reduce toxicity, or treat more patients who are seropositive to AAV vectors. In this review, the immunogenicity risk assessment, manifestation of immunogenicity and its impact in nonclinical and clinical studies, and various clinical mitigation strategies are summarized. Last, we present bioanalytical strategies, methodologies, and assay validation applied to appropriately monitor immunogenicity in AAV gene therapy-treated subjects.

Indexed as

adeno-associated virusbioanalytical methodologies and validation strategiesclinical mitigationgene therapyimmunogenicitynonclinical and clinical outcomesrisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID36092368
PMCPMC9418752
OpenAlexW4293223872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.