ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2022
Systematic review and meta-analysis of endoscopic ultrasonography in staging diagnosis of esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy.
Article in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Magnetic resonance imaging-based radiomics signature for predicting preoperative staging of esophageal cancer.World journal of radiology · 2025Article
- [Evidence for the extent and oncological benefit of lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Remarkable response as a new indicator for endoscopic evaluation of local efficacy of non-surgical treatments for esophageal cancer.Esophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society · 2024Review
- FDG PET/CT and Endoscopic Ultrasound for Preoperative T-Staging of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Clinically, it is necessary to evaluate the overall situation of the tumor before treatment, understand the disease stage of the patient, and choose the most reasonable treatment plan. Therefore, it is necessary to seek an efficient and accurate staging diagnosis method. Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is widely used in staging esophageal cancer, but its accuracy will be affected by the experience of endoscopic diagnosis physicians. Methods: Computer retrieval PubMed, MEDLINE, EBSCO, Science Direct, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI). Relevant literatures published from the database establishment to January 2022 were searched using "Endoscopic ultrasound, esophageal cancer, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, diagnosis, tumor node metastasis" as the detection term. Quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies (QUADAS) was used to evaluate the quality of the included literatures, Q test and heterogeneity (I2) was adopted to evaluate the heterogeneity among various studies, and the sensitivity and specificity of EUS were calculated and compared in evaluating various stages of esophageal cancer. Results: A total of 12 articles and 824 patients were included. 12 literatures on EUS in diagnosis of T staging were included for heterogeneity test, the combined sensitivity of T1-T4 stage was 0.16 (95% CI: 0.05-0.39), 0.34 (95% CI: 0.20-0.52), 0.78 (95% CI: 0.63-0.88), 0.16 (95% CI: 0.04-0.50). The combined specificity was 0.99 (95% CI: 0.94-1.00), 0.52 (95% CI: 0.36-0.68), 0.98 (95% CI: 0.95-0.99). According to the heterogeneity test of EUS n staging in 9 literatures, the combined sensitivities of N0-N1 stage was 0.62 (95% CI: 0.53-0.71) and 0.65 (95% CI: 0.58-0.72), combined specificities was 0.65 (95% CI: 0.58-0.71) and 0.63 (95% CI: 0.54-0.72). Discussion: Based on the results, EUS is not a good diagnostic test for TNM staging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.