Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36092345›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2022

Safety and effectiveness of apatinib in elderly patients with metastatic gastric cancer: a sub-analysis from the large-scale, prospective observational study of apatinib for gastric cancer treatment in a real-world clinical setting (AHEAD-G202).

Xiang Wang, Diansheng Zhong, Junping Zhang, Nan Du, Yuchuan Ren, Jinghua Gao, Likun Liu, Junyan Yu, Xiaomei Li, Liwen Ma and 16 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors at 13 institutions in 1 country.

Xiang Wang *Department of Medical Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Diansheng Zhong *Department of Medical Oncology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Junping Zhang *Department of Medical Oncology, Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences, Shanxi Dayi Hospital, Taiyuan, China.
Nan DuDepartment of Medical Oncology, Fourth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yuchuan RenDepartment of Oncology, Yangquan First People's Hospital, Yangquan, China.
Jinghua GaoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cangzhou Central Hospital, Cangzhou, China.
Likun LiuOncology Department, Shanxi Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Taiyuan, China.
Junyan YuDepartment of Oncology, Peace Hospital of Changzhi Medical College, Changzhi, China.
Xiaomei LiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Medical School of Chinese PLA, Beijing, China.
Liwen MaDepartment of Tumor Chemotherapy and Radiology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Aimin ZangDepartment of Medical Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University, Baoding, China.
Mudan YangDigestive Department of Oncology, Shanxi Tumor Hospital, Taiyuan, China.
Yan ZhangDepartment of Medical Oncology, Shijiazhuang People's Hospital, Shijiazhuang, China.
Jun GuoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Xingtai People's Hospital, Hebei Medical University Affiliated Hospital, Xingtai, China.
Zheng LiuDepartment of Radiology, Handan Central Hospital, Handan, China.
Zhanzhao FuDepartment of Medical Oncology, First Hospital of Qinhuangdao, Qinhuangdao, China.
Junmei JiaDepartment of Medical Oncology, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China.
Jianfeng DiaoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Datong Second People's Hospital, Datong, China.
Zaiwen FanDepartment of Medical Oncology, Air Force General Hospital, PLA, Beijing, China.
Xiang SongDepartment of Medical Oncology, Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China.
Guozhong LiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Peking University Binhai Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Huaqing WangDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tianjin People's Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Chunmei BaiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Mei GuanDepartment of Medical Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Xiubao RenDepartment of Biotherapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Ruixing ZhangDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNPeking Union Medical College Hospital · CNChinese PLA General Hospital · CNShanxi Dayi Hospital · CNTianjin Medical University General Hospital · CNAffiliated Hospital of Hebei University · CNAir Force General Hospital PLA · CNCangzhou Central Hospital · CNChangzhi Medical College Peace Hospital · CNFirst Hospital of Qinhuangdao · CNSecond Hospital of Shanxi Medical University · CNShanxi Medical University · CNShanxi Province Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Apatinib was shown to improve the survival of Chinese patients with refractory metastatic gastric cancer (mGC). As an orally administered drug, it has been widely used in elderly patients because the dosing schedule can be adjusted flexibly. However, data on the efficacy and safety of apatinib in elderly patients is scarce. The aim of this study was to evaluate the toxicity and effectiveness of apatinib for elderly patients with mGC in a real-world setting. Methods: Data from the sub-population of patients who were ≥65 years enrolled in the AHEAD-G202 trial were analyzed. Patients with mGC were prospectively registered and initially received ≤850 mg oral apatinib daily combined or not combined with chemotherapy, at the investigator's discretion. The primary endpoint was safety. The secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Results: A total of 117 patients were included. There were 51 (43.59%) patients in the low-dose (250 mg) group, 60 (51.28%) patients in the mid-dose (425 to 500 mg) group, and 6 (5.13%) patients in the high-dose (850 mg) group according to the initial daily doses. Hypertension (6.84%) was the only grade 3-4 adverse event (AE) with a prevalence of more than 5% and across the low-dose (11.76%), mid-dose (3.33%) and high-dose group (0%). The median OS and PFS were 7.13 months (95% CI: 5.04 to 9.22 months) and 4.27 months (95% CI: 3.24 to 5.29 months), respectively. The OS and PFS were similar among the 65-74 and ≥75 years groups (χ Conclusions: Elderly patients with mGC can tolerate and benefit from apatinib therapy. A lower initial daily dosing strategy may be a suitable choice for elderly patients in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Apatinibelderlymetastatic gastric cancer (mGC)real world

Identifiers

PMID36092345
PMCPMC9459208
OpenAlexW4292683850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.