Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36092325›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2022

A novel senescence-associated LncRNA signature predicts the prognosis and tumor microenvironment of patients with colorectal cancer: a bioinformatics analysis.

Enmin Huang, Tao Ma, Junyi Zhou, Ning Ma, Weisheng Yang, Chuangxiong Liu, Zehui Hou, Shuang Chen, Zhen Zong, Bing Zeng and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Involvement of lncRNA in cancer diagnosis and prognosis and clinical implications.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Enmin Huang *Department of Gastroenterological Surgery and Hernia Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Tao Ma *Department of Gastroenterological Surgery and Hernia Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Junyi Zhou *Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Ning MaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery and Hernia Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Weisheng YangDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery and Hernia Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Chuangxiong LiuDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery and Hernia Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Zehui HouDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery and Hernia Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Shuang ChenDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery and Hernia Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Zhen ZongDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Bing ZengDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery and Hernia Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Yingru LiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery and Hernia Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Taicheng ZhouDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery and Hernia Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Accumulating evidence suggests that cellular senescence promotes tumor formation and that long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) expression predicts tumor prognosis. However, senescence-related variables, particularly lncRNAs, are still largely unknown. Therefore, the present study developed a novel senescence-associated lncRNA signature to predict colorectal cancer (CRC) prognosis. Methods: A co-expression network of senescence-associated mRNAs and lncRNAs was built using RNA-sequence data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). By using the prognosis outcomes data of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) from TCGA, we constructed a prognostic senescence-associated lncRNA signature (SenALSig). The OS and DFS were compared between the low- and high- risk groups defined by SenALSig. A single-sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA) and CIBERSORT algorithm were used to investigate the relationship between the predictive signature and immune status. Finally, the relationship between SenALSig and drug treatment options was investigated. An independent CRC cohort and three CRC cell lines were recruited to perform real-time quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) analysis to validate the results discovered in silico. Results: A prognostic risk model consisting of six senescence-associated lncRNAs was constructed, including SNHG16, AL590483.1, ZEB1-AS1, AC107375.1, AC068580.3, and AC147067.1. High-risk scores according to the SenALSig were significantly associated with poor OS (hazard ratio =1.218, 95% confidence interval: 1.140-1.301; P<0.001). The model's accuracy was further supported by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves (the area under the curve is 0.714) and a principal component analysis (PCA). In univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses, SenALSig was further found to be a prognostic factor independent of other clinical factors. Furthermore, we discovered that immune checkpoint expression and response to chemotherapy and targeted therapy differed significantly between the SenALSig-stratified high- and low-risk groups. Finally, the qPCR results revealed that the expression levels of the six senescence-associated lncRNAs differed significantly between tumor and normal tissues and between the CRC cell lines and a normal human colon mucosal epithelial cell line. Conclusions: SenALSig can better predict survival and risk in CRC patients, as well as help develop new anti-cancer treatment strategies for CRC.

Indexed as

cellular senescenceColorectal cancer (CRC)immune responselong non-coding RNA (lncRNA)tumor microenvironment (TME)

Identifiers

PMID36092325
PMCPMC9459181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.