Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36092320›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2022

A phase II trial of gemcitabine and erlotinib followed by ChemoProton therapy plus capecitabine and oxaliplatin for locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

Samrat M Sanghvi, Alex R Coffman, Chung-Tsen Hsueh, Joseph Kang, Annie Park, Naveenraj L Solomon, Carlos A Garberoglio, Mark E Reeves, Jerry D Slater, Gary Y Yang

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Samrat M SanghviDepartment of Radiation Medicine, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Alex R CoffmanGreen Bay Oncology, Green Bay, WI, USA.
Chung-Tsen HsuehDepartment of Medical Oncology, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Joseph KangDepartment of Radiation Medicine, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Annie ParkDepartment of Medical Oncology, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Naveenraj L SolomonDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Carlos A GarberoglioDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Mark E ReevesDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Jerry D SlaterDepartment of Radiation Medicine, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Gary Y YangDepartment of Radiation Medicine, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Loma Linda University · USLoma Linda University Medical Center · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Green Bay · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is overexpressed in pancreatic cancer. EGFR expression plays a potentially important role in modulation of tumor sensitivity to either chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Erlotinib is a receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor with specificity for EGFR/HER1. A phase II trial was conducted to explore the efficacy of a regimen utilizing erlotinib and proton therapy. Methods: Patients with unresectable or borderline resectable non-metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas were included. Patients received 8-week systemic treatment with gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m Results: The study enrolled 9 patients ages 47-81 years old (median 62) between January 2013 and March 2016, when the trial was closed due to low patient accrual. The 1-year OS rate was 55.6% (95% CI: 31% to 99%). The median OS was 14.1 months (95% CI: 11.4-NE) and the median PFS was 10.8 months (95% CI: 7.44-NE). A majority of patients completed CPT and GE, but only 33.3% completed the four cycles of CapOx. A third of patients experienced grade 3 toxicities, which were all hepatic along with one patient who also had grade 3 diarrhea. There were no grade 4 or 5 toxicities. Four patients were enrolled with borderline resectable disease, three of which were eligible for pancreaticoduodenectomy after GE and CPT treatment. One of two patients who underwent resection had a negative margin. Conclusions: This regimen for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) exceeded the pre-specified benchmark and was safe and well tolerated. Additional investigations utilizing more current systemic treatment regimens with proton therapy are warranted. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCTNCT01683422).

Indexed as

chemotherapyerlotinibLocally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC)proton radiation therapytargeted therapy

Identifiers

PMID36092320
PMCPMC9459205
OpenAlexW4288061634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.