Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36092304›Full record

ReviewBrain communications2022

Moving the field forward: detection of epileptiform abnormalities on scalp electroencephalography using deep learning-clinical application perspectives.

Mubeen Janmohamed, Duong Nhu, Levin Kuhlmann, Amanda Gilligan, Chang Wei Tan, Piero Perucca, Terence J O'Brien, Patrick Kwan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mubeen JanmohamedDepartment of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8601-3686
Duong NhuDepartment of Data Science and AI, Faculty of IT, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia.
Levin KuhlmannDepartment of Data Science and AI, Faculty of IT, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia.
Amanda GilliganNeurosciences Clinical Institute, Epworth Healthcare Hospital, Melbourne, VIC 3121, Australia.
Chang Wei TanDepartment of Data Science and AI, Faculty of IT, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia.
Piero PeruccaDepartment of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia.
Terence J O'BrienDepartment of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia.
Patrick KwanDepartment of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The application of deep learning approaches for the detection of interictal epileptiform discharges is a nascent field, with most studies published in the past 5 years. Although many recent models have been published demonstrating promising results, deficiencies in descriptions of data sets, unstandardized methods, variation in performance evaluation and lack of demonstrable generalizability have made it difficult for these algorithms to be compared and progress to clinical validity. A few recent publications have provided a detailed breakdown of data sets and relevant performance metrics to exemplify the potential of deep learning in epileptiform discharge detection. This review provides an overview of the field and equips computer and data scientists with a synopsis of EEG data sets, background and epileptiform variation, model evaluation parameters and an awareness of the performance metrics of high impact and interest to the trained clinical and neuroscientist EEG end user. The gold standard and inter-rater disagreements in defining epileptiform abnormalities remain a challenge in the field, and a hierarchical proposal for epileptiform discharge labelling options is recommended. Standardized descriptions of data sets and reporting metrics are a priority. Source code-sharing and accessibility to public EEG data sets will increase the rigour, quality and progress in the field and allow validation and real-world clinical translation.

Indexed as

automated detectiondeep learningEEGepilepsyepileptiform abnormalities

Identifiers

PMID36092304
PMCPMC9453433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.