Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36092203›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of dermatology

Haematologic-Related Malignancy-Induced Eosinophilic Dermatoses (He Remained): A Narrative Review.

Bikash Ranjan Kar, Akash Agarwal

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of dermatology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bikash Ranjan KarDepartment of Dermatology IMS and SUM Hospital, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Akash AgarwalDepartment of Dermatology IMS and SUM Hospital, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Institute of Medical Sciences and Sum Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

He remained(Hematologic Related Malignancy- induced Eosinophilic dermatoses) is a new eponym introduced to describe a dermatoses previously described under several terminologies such as eosinophilic dermatoses of haematological malignancy, exaggerated arthropod bite reactions, insect bite-like reactions and T-cell papulosis associated with B-cell malignancies. This chronic relapsing remitting disease has a pleomorphic presentation mimicking a variety of dermatological conditions. The underlying pathophysiology is however poorly understood. It is a paraneoplastic phenomenon hence an underlying haematological malignancy must always be looked for. Response to conventional modalities of treatment such as oral corticosteroids is rapid and satisfactory. Other newer modalities are also in the pipeline. In this manuscript, we present a narrative review of this recently described entity with data identified via a search on 27 September, 2021 in PubMed, EMBASE and MEDLINE using the term 'Eosinophilic dermatoses of haematological malignancy' AND 'Hematologic related malignancy-induced eosinophilic dermatoses'. A total of 67 cases reported in the literature from the year 2012 onward have been included. The literatures pertaining to insect bite-like reactions and exaggerated insect bite hypersensitivity have been excluded in this review.

Indexed as

Eosinophilic dermatosis of haematological maligancyHe remainedinsect bite like reaction

Identifiers

PMID36092203
PMCPMC9455086
OpenAlexW4295459475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.