ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2022
Automatic recognition of parasitic products in stool examination using object detection approach.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automated detection and classification of intestinal protozoan cysts using a nuclei structure-based deep learning framework for epidemiological surveillance.Parasite epidemiology and control · 2026Article
- Deep learning applications in parasite microscopy: A scoping review.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2026Article
- An expert-level vision-language model for multitask diagnostic morphology in clinical laboratories.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-powered microscopy: Transforming the landscape of parasitology.Journal of microscopy · 2026Review
- Precise detection of Eimeria oocysts in sheep: a deep learning model based on microscopic images.Parasites & vectors · 2025Article
- Performance validation of deep-learning-based approach in stool examination.Parasites & vectors · 2025Article
- Deep learning-based automated detection and multiclass classification of soil-transmitted helminths and Schistosoma mansoni eggs in fecal smear images.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Real-Time American Sign Language Interpretation Using Deep Learning and Keypoint Tracking.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- ParasitoBank dataset for diagnosing intestinal parasitism: Helminths and protozoa in coprological samples.Data in brief · 2025Article
- Automated detection of pinworm parasite eggs using YOLO convolutional block attention module for enhanced microscopic image analysis.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Validation of Vetscan ImagystParasites & vectors · 2024Article
- Identification of veterinary and medically important blood parasites using contrastive loss-based self-supervised learning.Veterinary world · 2024Article
- Effective Laboratory Diagnosis of Parasitic Infections of the Gastrointestinal Tract: Where, When, How, and What Should We Look For?Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Development of a Machine Learning Model for the Classification ofJournal of imaging · 2024Article
- Towards automatic farrowing monitoring-A Noisy Student approach for improving detection performance of newborn piglets.PloS one · 2024Article
- Automating parasite egg detection: insights from the first AI-KFM challenge.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2024Article
- Automatic detection ofPeerJ · 2024Article
- Two-stage automated diagnosis framework for urogenital schistosomiasis in microscopy images from low-resource settings.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2023Article
- Improved YOLOv4-tiny based on attention mechanism for skin detection.PeerJ. Computer science · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Object detection is a new artificial intelligence approach to morphological recognition and labeling parasitic pathogens. Due to the lack of equipment and trained personnel, artificial intelligence innovation for searching various parasitic products in stool examination will enable patients in remote areas of undeveloped countries to access diagnostic services. Because object detection is a developing approach that has been tested for its effectiveness in detecting intestinal parasitic objects such as protozoan cysts and helminthic eggs, it is suitable for use in rural areas where many factors supporting laboratory testing are still lacking. Based on the literatures, the YOLOv4-Tiny produces faster results and uses less memory with the support of low-end GPU devices. In comparison to the YOLOv3 and YOLOv3-Tiny models, this study aimed to propose an automated object detection approach, specifically the YOLOv4-Tiny model, for automatic recognition of intestinal parasitic products in stools. Methods: To identify protozoan cysts and helminthic eggs in human feces, the three YOLO approaches; YOLOv4-Tiny, YOLOv3, and YOLOv3-Tiny, were trained to recognize 34 intestinal parasitic classes using training of image dataset. Feces were processed using a modified direct smear method adapted from the simple direct smear and the modified Kato-Katz methods. The image dataset was collected from intestinal parasitic objects discovered during stool examination and the three YOLO models were trained to recognize the image datasets. Results: The non-maximum suppression technique and the threshold level were used to analyze the test dataset, yielding results of 96.25% precision and 95.08% sensitivity for YOLOv4-Tiny. Additionally, the YOLOv4-Tiny model had the best AUPRC performance of the three YOLO models, with a score of 0.963. Conclusion: This study, to our knowledge, was the first to detect protozoan cysts and helminthic eggs in the 34 classes of intestinal parasitic objects in human stools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.