Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36091982›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2022

Automatic computer science domain multiple-choice questions generation based on informative sentences.

Farah Maheen, Muhammad Asif, Haseeb Ahmad, Shahbaz Ahmad, Fahad Alturise, Othman Asiry, Yazeed Yasin Ghadi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Farah Maheen *Department of Computer Science, National Textile University, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Muhammad AsifDepartment of Computer Science, National Textile University, Faisalabad, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0003-1839-2527
Haseeb AhmadDepartment of Computer Science, National Textile University, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Shahbaz AhmadDepartment of Computer Science, National Textile University, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Fahad AlturiseDepartment of Computer, College of Science and Arts in Ar Rass, Qassim University, Ar Rass, Qassim, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-9176-7984
Othman AsiryDepartment of Information Technology, College of Computing and Information Technology at Khulais, University of Jeddah, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Yazeed Yasin Ghadi *Department of Computer Science/Software Engineering, Al Ain University, Abu Dhabi, UAE.ORCID 0000-0002-7121-495X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Students require continuous feedback for effective learning. Multiple choice questions (MCQs) are extensively used among various assessment methods to provide such feedback. However, manual MCQ generation is a tedious task that requires significant effort, time, and domain knowledge. Therefore, a system must be present that can automatically generate MCQs from the given text. The automatic generation of MCQs can be carried out by following three sequential steps: extracting informative sentences from the textual data, identifying the key, and determining distractors. The dataset comprising of various topics from the 9th and 11th-grade computer science course books are used in this work. Moreover, TF-IDF, Jaccard similarity, quality phrase mining, K-means, and bidirectional encoder representation from transformers techniques are utilized for automatic MCQs generation. Domain experts validated the generated MCQs with 83%, 77%, and 80% accuracy, key generation, and distractor generation, respectively. The overall MCQ generation achieved 80% accuracy through this system by the experts. Finally, a desktop app was developed that takes the contents in textual form as input, processes it at the backend, and visualizes the generated MCQs on the interface. The presented solution may help teachers, students, and other stakeholders with automatic MCQ generation.

Indexed as

BERTMultiple choice questionsNatural language processingText analysisTF-IDF

Identifiers

PMID36091982
PMCPMC9454961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.