ReviewBiophysics reviews2022
Myocardial infarction from a tissue engineering and regenerative medicine point of view: A comprehensive review on models and treatments.
Review in Biophysics reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- "Comprehensive multi-omics of age-respective plasma and matrix-bound extracellular vesicles identifies anti-fibrotic miRNAs validated on a heart-on-a-chip".Biomaterials · 2026Article
- Single-atom Pt-doped ceria nanozymes mitigate myocardial ischemia reperfusion injury via cardiomyocyte-targeted uptake and suppression of reactive oxygen species.Bioactive materials · 2025Article
- Hypothermic and cryogenic preservation of cardiac tissue-engineered constructs.Biomaterials science · 2024Article
- The Role of Biophysical Factors in Organ Development: Insights from Current Organoid Models.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- 3D bioprinted aged human post-infarct myocardium tissue model.Health science reports · 2024Article
- Review
- An Experimental and Numerical Investigation of Cardiac Tissue-Patch Interrelation.Journal of biomechanical engineering · 2023Article
- The Role of ncRNAs in Cardiac Infarction and Regeneration.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In the modern world, myocardial infarction is one of the most common cardiovascular diseases, which are responsible for around 18 million deaths every year or almost 32% of all deaths. Due to the detrimental effects of COVID-19 on the cardiovascular system, this rate is expected to increase in the coming years. Although there has been some progress in myocardial infarction treatment, translating pre-clinical findings to the clinic remains a major challenge. One reason for this is the lack of reliable and human representative healthy and fibrotic cardiac tissue models that can be used to understand the fundamentals of ischemic/reperfusion injury caused by myocardial infarction and to test new drugs and therapeutic strategies. In this review, we first present an overview of the anatomy of the heart and the pathophysiology of myocardial infarction, and then discuss the recent developments on pre-clinical infarct models, focusing mainly on the engineered three-dimensional cardiac ischemic/reperfusion injury and fibrosis models developed using different engineering methods such as organoids, microfluidic devices, and bioprinted constructs. We also present the benefits and limitations of emerging and promising regenerative therapy treatments for myocardial infarction such as cell therapies, extracellular vesicles, and cardiac patches. This review aims to overview recent advances in three-dimensional engineered infarct models and current regenerative therapeutic options, which can be used as a guide for developing new models and treatment strategies.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.