Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36091894›Full record

ArticleChemical science2022

Inverse potential scaling in co-electrocatalytic activity for CO

Amelia G Reid, Juan J Moreno, Shelby L Hooe, Kira R Baugh, Isobel H Thomas, Diane A Dickie, Charles W Machan

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Chemical science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Homogeneous redox catalysed reduction of CODalton transactions (Cambridge, England : 2003) · 2026
    Article
  2. Recent Advances in Mediator and Proton Relay Usage in Molecular Catalysis.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Highly efficient electrocatalytic COProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Amelia G ReidDepartment of Chemistry, University of Virginia PO Box 400319 Charlottesville VA 22904-4319 USA machan@virginia.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2868-4091
Juan J MorenoDepartment of Chemistry, University of Virginia PO Box 400319 Charlottesville VA 22904-4319 USA machan@virginia.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1809-6170
Shelby L HooeDepartment of Chemistry, University of Virginia PO Box 400319 Charlottesville VA 22904-4319 USA machan@virginia.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6991-2273
Kira R BaughDepartment of Chemistry, University of Virginia PO Box 400319 Charlottesville VA 22904-4319 USA machan@virginia.edu.
Isobel H ThomasDepartment of Chemistry, University of Virginia PO Box 400319 Charlottesville VA 22904-4319 USA machan@virginia.edu.
Diane A DickieDepartment of Chemistry, University of Virginia PO Box 400319 Charlottesville VA 22904-4319 USA machan@virginia.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0939-3309
Charles W MachanDepartment of Chemistry, University of Virginia PO Box 400319 Charlottesville VA 22904-4319 USA machan@virginia.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5182-1138

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electrocatalytic CO

Identifiers

PMID36091894
PMCPMC9400620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.