ArticleCanadian medical education journal2022
Multisource feedback: an overview of its use and application as a formative assessment.
Article in Canadian medical education journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Beyond traditional metrics: the holistic role of multisource feedback in comprehensive dental clinical education.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Spiritual Care Empowerment and Midwives' Adherence to the Maternal Rights Charter: A Quasiexperimental Study Using 360-Degree Evaluation.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
- Development and psychometric properties of a questionnaire to evaluate the professional behavior of medical residents.PloS one · 2026Article
- Continuing Professional Development in an Era of Physician Burnout.Journal of CME · 2026Article
- Article
- Clinical education: nursing students' experiences with multisource feedback using a digital assessment instrument in the emergency medical Service - a qualitative study.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Exploring the concepts of consumer feedback systems for occupational therapy student learning during practice placements: A scoping review.Australian occupational therapy journal · 2024Article
- Leaders development program by 360 degree feedback: reflection on head nurses' leadership practices.BMC nursing · 2024Article
- A 360-degree evaluation of the professionalism and communication skills of technologists working in the radiology department of a public sector tertiary care hospital in Karachi, Pakistan.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Article
- An open letter to all stakeholders involved in medicine and medical education in Canada.Canadian medical education journal · 2022Article
- From pain gaslighting to gender biases in women's accounts of hysteroscopy: A qualitative reflexive thematic analysis.Women's health (London, England)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multisource feedback (MSF), often termed 360-degree feedback, is a formative performance assessment in which data about an individual's observable workplace behaviors are collected through questionnaires from those interacting with the individual; data are aggregated for anonymity and confidentiality; the aggregated data, along with self-assessment if available, are provided to the individual; and the recipient meets with a trusted individual to review the data and develop an action plan. It is used along the continuum of medical education. This article provides an overview of MSF's utility, its evidence base and cautions.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.