Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36091600›Full record

ArticleEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM2022

Comparison of the Effect of EMLA™ Cream and the Valsalva Maneuver on Pain Severity during Vascular Needle Insertion in Hemodialysis Patients: A Controlled, Randomized, Clinical Trial.

Hassan Babamohamadi, Zahra Ameri, Ilia Asadi, Mohammad Reza Asgari

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07066579 (Evaluation of the Effect of the Valsalva Maneuver on Invasive Pain During Arteriovenous Fistula Cannulation in Hemodialysis Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07066579 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of the Effect of the Valsalva Maneuver on Invasive Pain During Arteriovenous Fistula Cannulation in Hemodialysis Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorCansu POLAT DÜNYARan2025 to 2026Enrolled60ConditionsArteriovenous Fistula, Pain, Hemodialysis Access Failure, Vascular Access Device ComplicationsArmsValsalva Maneuver
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hassan BabamohamadiNursing Care Research Center, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan 3513138111, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3786-7348
Zahra AmeriStudent Research Committee, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan 3513138111, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3201-4111
Ilia AsadiStudent Research Committee, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan 3513138111, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8868-3165
Mohammad Reza AsgariNursing Care Research Center, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan 3513138111, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0263-7614
Semnan University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pain due to vascular needle insertion has been reported in 40-60% of hemodialysis (HD) patients. Evidence suggests that there is typically no single method for relieving the pain of inserting vascular needles in HD patients. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of EMLA cream and Valsalva maneuver (VM) on pain severity during vascular needle insertion in HD patients. Methods: This randomized, controlled, clinical trial was conducted on 90 patients undergoing hemodialysis in the hemodialysis unit of Kowsar Hospital, affiliated with Semnan University of Medical Sciences, in Semnan, Iran. Patients were selected via convenience sampling and were randomly assigned to one of the three groups (EMLA, VM, and control groups). For the patients in the EMLA group, 2.5 g of EMLA cream was applied 60 minutes before the start of dialysis. For patients in the VM group, a maneuver was performed for 16-20 seconds before the needle was inserted. Patients in the control group received only routine care without any additional interventions. The pain severity in the three groups was measured using the visual analog scale (VAS) two minutes after vascular needle insertion. Results: The results showed that the mean pain severity during cannulation was 2.06 ± 2.19 in the EMLA group, 3.2 ± 30.42 in the VM group, and 6.20 ± 1.49 in the control group, suggesting a significant difference between the groups ( Conclusion: According to the results, EMLA cream was as effective as VM in reducing the pain severity caused by arteriovenous fistula (AVF) cannulation. Therefore, the use of EMLA cream and VM is recommended for reducing the severity of AVF cannulation pain.

Identifiers

PMID36091600
PMCPMC9451986
OpenAlexW4293843261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.