Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36091529›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2022

Comparative studies of deep learning segmentation models for left ventricle segmentation.

Muhammad Ali Shoaib, Khin Wee Lai, Joon Huang Chuah, Yan Chai Hum, Raza Ali, Samiappan Dhanalakshmi, Huanhuan Wang, Xiang Wu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Marker-less tracking system for multiple mice using Mask R-CNN.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Muhammad Ali ShoaibDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Khin Wee LaiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Joon Huang ChuahDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Yan Chai HumDepartment of Mechatronics and Biomedical Engineering, Lee Kong Chian Faculty of Engineering and Science, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, Kajang, Malaysia.
Raza AliDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Samiappan DhanalakshmiDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur, India.
Huanhuan WangInstitute of Medical Information Security, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.
Xiang WuInstitute of Medical Information Security, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.
University of Malaya · MYXuzhou Medical College · CNBalochistan University of Information Technology, Engineering and Management Sciences · PKSRM Institute of Science and Technology · INUniversiti Tunku Abdul Rahman · MY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the primary factors contributing to death across all age groups is cardiovascular disease. In the analysis of heart function, analyzing the left ventricle (LV) from 2D echocardiographic images is a common medical procedure for heart patients. Consistent and accurate segmentation of the LV exerts significant impact on the understanding of the normal anatomy of the heart, as well as the ability to distinguish the aberrant or diseased structure of the heart. Therefore, LV segmentation is an important and critical task in medical practice, and automated LV segmentation is a pressing need. The deep learning models have been utilized in research for automatic LV segmentation. In this work, three cutting-edge convolutional neural network architectures (SegNet, Fully Convolutional Network, and Mask R-CNN) are designed and implemented to segment the LV. In addition, an echocardiography image dataset is generated, and the amount of training data is gradually increased to measure segmentation performance using evaluation metrics. The pixel's accuracy, precision, recall, specificity, Jaccard index, and dice similarity coefficients are applied to evaluate the three models. The Mask R-CNN model outperformed the other two models in these evaluation metrics. As a result, the Mask R-CNN model is used in this study to examine the effect of training data. For 4,000 images, the network achieved 92.21% DSC value, 85.55% Jaccard index, 98.76% mean accuracy, 96.81% recall, 93.15% precision, and 96.58% specificity value. Relatively, the Mask R-CNN outperformed other architectures, and the performance achieves stability when the model is trained using more than 4,000 training images.

Indexed as

Deep LearningHeart VentriclesHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedNeural Networks, ComputerConvolutional Neural Network (CNN)deep learningechocardiographyimage processingleft ventricle (LV)segmentation

Identifiers

PMID36091529
PMCPMC9453312
OpenAlexW4293036922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.