ArticleFrontiers in public health2022
Network meta-analysis of deaths from various underlying diseases after COVID-19 infection.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Network meta-analysis of deaths from various underlying diseases after COVID-19 infection. This study included more than 10 research centers with the same level of care. In total, 1,676 subjects were included in our study, including 1,122 men and 554 women, patients diagnosed with COVID-19, and combined with underlying diseases; provided data on the number of deaths from related diseases, such as hypertension, diabetes, heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, malignant tumor, chronic kidney disease, chronic liver disease, and respiratory disease. The comparison RR between hypertension and different diseases shows that it is (RR = 2.35, 95% CI: 1.47, 3.98) compared with diabetes, compared with coronary heart disease (RR = 2.57, 95% CI: 1.5, 4.4), compared with cerebrovascular disease (RR = 3.68, 95% CI: 1.87, 7.29), compared with malignant tumor (RR = 6.35, 95% CI: 3.45, 11.97), and compared with chronic kidney disease (RR = 5.53 95% CI: 3.04, 10.34), compared with chronic liver disease (RR = 15.51, 95% CI: 5.26, 50.98), compared with respiratory diseases (RR = 4.35, 95% CI: 2.37, 7.65), RR values are >1, which is statistically significant. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) showed that the ranking of disease mortality from high to low was hypertension> diabetes> heart disease> cerebrovascular disease> respiratory disease> chronic kidney disease> malignant tumor> chronic liver disease. The study that hypertension, diabetes, and heart disease are the top three risk factors for patients infected with COVID-19, and management of these patients should be strengthened to improve the prognosis of patients. Ethical approval and patient consent are not required as this study is a meta-analysis based on published studies. The results of this network meta-analysis will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal for the publication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.