Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36091344›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2022

Estimation of breeding population size using DNA-based pedigree reconstruction in brown bears.

Michito Shimozuru, Mina Jimbo, Keisuke Adachi, Kei Kawamura, Yuri Shirane, Yoshihiro Umemura, Tsuyoshi Ishinazaka, Masanao Nakanishi, Mayu Kiyonari, Masami Yamanaka and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Confirmation of the Tibetan Brown Bear (Ecology and evolution · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Patterns of intestinal parasite prevalence in brown bears (International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Michito ShimozuruLaboratory of Wildlife Biology and Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine Hokkaido University Sapporo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3281-8208
Mina JimboLaboratory of Wildlife Biology and Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine Hokkaido University Sapporo Japan.
Keisuke AdachiLaboratory of Wildlife Biology and Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine Hokkaido University Sapporo Japan.
Kei KawamuraLaboratory of Wildlife Biology and Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine Hokkaido University Sapporo Japan.
Yuri ShiraneLaboratory of Wildlife Biology and Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine Hokkaido University Sapporo Japan.
Yoshihiro UmemuraShiretoko Nature Foundation Shari Japan.
Tsuyoshi IshinazakaShiretoko Nature Foundation Shari Japan.
Masanao NakanishiShiretoko Nature Foundation Shari Japan.
Mayu KiyonariShiretoko Nature Foundation Shari Japan.
Masami YamanakaShiretoko Nature Foundation Shari Japan.
Yukihiro AmagaiShiretoko Nature Foundation Shari Japan.
Ayaho IjuinShiretoko Nature Foundation Shari Japan.
Tomoki SakiyamaShiretoko Nature Foundation Shari Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3655-0832
Shinsuke KasaiShiretoko Nature Foundation Shari Japan.
Takane NoseShiretoko Nature Foundation Shari Japan.
Masataka ShirayanagiShiretoko Nature Foundation Shari Japan.
Hifumi TsurugaHokkaido Research Organization Sapporo Japan.
Tsutomu ManoHokkaido Research Organization Sapporo Japan.
Toshio TsubotaLaboratory of Wildlife Biology and Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine Hokkaido University Sapporo Japan.
Keita FukasawaCenter for Environmental Biology and Ecosystem Studies National Institute for Environmental Studies Tsukuba Japan.
Hiroyuki UnoFaculty of Agriculture Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology Tokyo Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Robust estimates of demographic parameters are critical for effective wildlife conservation and management but are difficult to obtain for elusive species. We estimated the breeding and adult population sizes, as well as the minimum population size, in a high-density brown bear population on the Shiretoko Peninsula, in Hokkaido, Japan, using DNA-based pedigree reconstruction. A total of 1288 individuals, collected in and around the Shiretoko Peninsula between 1998 and 2020, were genotyped at 21 microsatellite loci. Among them, 499 individuals were identified by intensive genetic sampling conducted in two consecutive years (2019 and 2020) mainly by noninvasive methods (e.g., hair and fecal DNA). Among them, both parents were assigned for 330 bears, and either maternity or paternity was assigned to 47 and 76 individuals, respectively. The subsequent pedigree reconstruction indicated a range of breeding and adult (≥4 years old) population sizes: 128-173 for female breeders and 66-91 male breeders, and 155-200 for female adults and 84-109 male adults. The minimum population size was estimated to be 449 (252 females and 197 males) in 2019. Long-term continuous genetic sampling prior to a short-term intensive survey would enable parentage to be identified in a population with a high probability, thus enabling reliable estimates of breeding population size for elusive species.

Indexed as

breeding population sizebrown bearmicrosatellite analysispedigree reconstructionpopulation estimateUrsus arctos

Identifiers

PMID36091344
PMCPMC9448969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.