ArticleBone reports2022
Cortical bone relationships are maintained regardless of sex and diet in a large population of LGXSM advanced intercross mice.
Article in Bone reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Demystifying machine learning approaches in digital bone imaging using microCT and HRpQCT.Bone reports · 2026Review
- Multi-scale cortical bone traits vary in females and males from two mouse models of genetic diversity.JBMR plus · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Knowledge of bone structure-function relationships in mice has been based on relatively small sample sets that limit generalizability. We sought to investigate structure-function relationships of long bones from a large population of genetically diverse mice. Therefore, we analyzed previously published data from the femur and radius of male and female mice from the F34 generation of the Large-by-Small advanced intercross line (LGXSM AI), which have over a two-fold continuous spread of bone and body sizes (Silva et al. 2019 JBMR). Methods: Morphological traits, mechanical properties, and estimated material properties were collected from the femur and radius from 1113 LGXSM AI adult mice (avg. age 25 wks). Males and females fed a low-fat or high-fat diet were evaluated to increase population variation. The data were analyzed using principal component analysis (PCA), Pearson's correlation, and multivariate linear regression. Results: Using PCA groupings and hierarchical clustering, we identified a reduced set of traits that span the population variation and are relatively independent of each other. These include three morphometry parameters (cortical area, medullary area, and length), two mechanical properties (ultimate force and post-yield displacement), and one material property (ultimate stress). When comparing traits of the femur to the radius, morphological traits are moderately well correlated (r Discussion: Our results indicate that variation in cortical bone phenotype in the F34 LGXSM AI mouse population can be adequately described by a reduced set of bone traits. These traits include cortical area, medullary area, bone length, ultimate force, post-yield displacement, and ultimate stress. The weak correlation of mechanical and material properties between the femur and radius indicates that the results from routine three-point bending tests of one long bone (e.g., femur) may not be generalizable to another long bone (e.g., radius). Additionally, these properties could not be fully predicted from bone morphology alone, confirming the importance of mechanical testing. Finally, material properties of the femur estimated based on beam theory equations showed a strong dependence on geometry that was not seen in the radius, suggesting that differences in femur size within a study may confound interpretation of estimated material properties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.