ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022
The
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prostate cancer in China: epidemiological trends, genomic insights, and future directions for optimized management.Journal of the National Cancer Center · 2025Review
- Diagnostic value ofCancer biology & therapy · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT is potentially identifying patients with oligo-metastasis who would be deemed to only have localized disease in the traditional approaches. However, the best selected oligo-metastasis prostate cancer (PCa) patients most likely to benefit from system androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) are still unknown. The aim of this study was to explore the potential Materials and methods: A total of 180 retrospective patients with different metastasis burdens (PCa of none-metastases, oligo-metastases, and poly-metastases), different metastasis status (untreated and recurrent oligo-metastases), and follow-up ADT were included respectively. A one-way analysis of variance was used to evaluate whether PET/CT parameters and clinicopathologic characteristics were different and univariate/multivariate logistic regression models were applied to assess independent predictors in the metastasis burdens group (89/180). Selected predictors were further compared between different metastasis statuses to test the diagnostic accuracy (69/180). The predictor efficiency was evaluated by the ROC and the cut-off value was used to test the ADT response-to-treatment with a longitudinal cohort (22/180) from untreated baseline to 3-15 months. Results: The significant group differences were observed on SUVmax (P = 0.012), International Society of Urologic Pathologists (ISUP, P<0.001) and Gleason Score (P<0.001). Poly-Metastases patients had higher SUVmax, ISUP and Gleason Score compared to Non-Metastases and Oligo-Metastases patients, respectively (P<0.05, all), and no difference between Non-Metastases and Oligo-Metastases. The SUVmax, ISUP and Gleason Score were independent predictors for metastasis burdens discrimination. The untreated and recurrent oligo-metastases lesions SUVmax were also different (P = 0.036). The AUC of ROC for oligo-metastasis prediction was 0.658 (P = 0.039) when the primary prostatic carcinoma focus SUVmax was higher than 28.22, ADT response-to-treatment patients (5/5 in 22) were all progress in a follow-up test. Conclusion: The SUVmax can discriminate PCa metastasis degree and oligo-metastasis status. The ADT-treated oligo-metastasis patient may still have disease progression when the primary prostatic carcinoma focus SUVmax is greater than 28.22.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.