Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36091112›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Bile is a reliable and valuable source to study cfDNA in biliary tract cancers.

Zhanghui Li, Yelei Liu, Junhui Fu, Joseph Mugaanyi, Junrong Yan, Caide Lu, Jing Huang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Next Generation Sequencing for the Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Biliary Strictures.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Biliary tract cancers: advances in diagnostic and management.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zhanghui LiDepartment of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Ningbo Medical Center Lihuili Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, China.
Yelei LiuDepartment of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Ningbo Medical Center Lihuili Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, China.
Junhui FuDepartment of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Ningbo Medical Center Lihuili Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, China.
Joseph MugaanyiDepartment of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Ningbo Medical Center Lihuili Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, China.
Junrong YanMedical Department, Nanjing Geneseeq Technology Inc., Nanjing, China.
Caide LuDepartment of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Ningbo Medical Center Lihuili Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, China.
Jing HuangDepartment of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Ningbo Medical Center Lihuili Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, China.
Ningbo Medical Center Lihuili Hospital · CNNingbo University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study is to determine the clinical efficacy of bile-derived liquid biopsy compared with plasma and tumor tissue biopsy in patients with biliary tract carcinoma (BTC). Methods: A total of 13 patients with BTC were enrolled in this cohort. Tumor tissue, bile, and plasma samples were obtained and analyzed using next-generation sequencing for genomic profiling. Results: Bile and plasma samples were collected from all 13 patients, and 11 patients also had matched tumor tissues available. The cell-free DNA (cfDNA) concentration was significantly higher in the bile supernatant than in plasma (median: 1918 vs. 63.1 ng/ml, p = 0.0017). The bile supernatant and pellet had a significantly higher mean mutation allele frequency (MF) than plasma (median: 3.84% vs. 4.22% vs. 0.16%; p < 0.001). Genomic alterations were predominantly missense. Both bile supernatant and pellet had significantly more genomic alterations than plasma (average: 9.3 vs. 7.2 vs. 2.3 alterations per sample; p < 0.01). Among the top 10 most frequent genomic alterations, the consistency between bile supernatant and tumor tissue was 90.00% (18/20), that between bile pellet and tumor tissue was 85.00% (17/20), and that between the plasma and tissue was only 35.00% (7/20). MAF of both bile supernatant and pellet was positively correlated with that in tissue samples (ρ < 0.0001, spearman r = 0.777, and ρ < 0.0001, spearman r = 0.787, respectively), but no significant correlation with tissue was found in the plasma (ρ = 0.966, spearman r = 0.008). Furthermore, additional genomic alterations could be detected in bile supernatant and pellet than in tissue. Potential targets for targeted therapy were identified in bile supernatant and pellet. Regarding copy number variation (CNV) and chromosomal instability (CIN) detection, four additional CNVs from two patients were detected in the bile supernatant that was not detected in tissues (i.e., amplification of Conclusion: The consistency of all genomic alterations and tumor tissue-determined genomic alteration in the bile supernatant/pellet was significantly higher than in plasma. Bile supernatants/pellets are better for genetic sequencing and may also have potential clinical value to guide targeted therapy and evaluate prognosis. Bile cfDNA may be a feasible substitute for tumor tissue in the genetic testing of patients with BTC.

Indexed as

bilebiliary tract carcinomachromosomal instabilityliquid biopsynext-generation sequencing

Identifiers

PMID36091112
PMCPMC9459008
OpenAlexW4293206932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.