Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36091069›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2022

Precise somatic genome editing for treatment of inborn errors of immunity.

Qingzhou Meng, Haixiang Sun, Jianghuai Liu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Qingzhou MengReproductive Medicine Center, The Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University School of Medicine, Nanjing, China.
Haixiang SunReproductive Medicine Center, The Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University School of Medicine, Nanjing, China.
Jianghuai LiuState Key Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology and MOE Key Laboratory of Model Animals for Disease Study, Model Animal Research Center at Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapid advances in high throughput sequencing have substantially expedited the identification and diagnosis of inborn errors of immunity (IEI). Correction of faulty genes in the hematopoietic stem cells can potentially provide cures for the majority of these monogenic immune disorders. Given the clinical efficacies of vector-based gene therapies already established for certain groups of IEI, the recently emerged genome editing technologies promise to bring safer and more versatile treatment options. Here, we review the latest development in genome editing technologies, focusing on the state-of-the-art tools with improved precision and safety profiles. We subsequently summarize the recent preclinical applications of genome editing tools in IEI models, and discuss the major challenges and future perspectives of such treatment modalities. Continued explorations of precise genome editing for IEI treatment shall move us closer toward curing these unfortunate rare diseases.

Indexed as

Gene EditingGenetic Therapybase editinggene therapygenome editinghematopoietic stem cell (HSC)inborn errors of immunity (IEI)prime editing

Identifiers

PMID36091069
PMCPMC9459235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.