Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36090993›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2022

Comprehensive analysis of pyroptotic gene prognostic signatures associated with tumor immune microenvironment and genomic mutation in breast cancer.

Hongfei Zhang, Xiafei Yu, Junzhe Yang, Gao He, Xiaoqiang Zhang, Xian Wu, Li Shen, Yi Zhou, Xuyu Cheng, Xiaoan Liu and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Hongfei ZhangDepartment of Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Xiafei YuDepartment of Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Junzhe YangDepartment of Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Gao HeDepartment of Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Xiaoqiang ZhangDepartment of Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Xian WuDepartment of Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Li ShenDepartment of Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Yi ZhouDepartment of Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Xuyu ChengDepartment of Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Xiaoan LiuDepartment of Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Yanhui ZhuDepartment of Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Breast cancer is becoming a tumor with the highest morbidity rate, and inflammation-induced cell death namely pyroptosis reportedly plays dual roles in cancers. However, the specific mechanism between pyroptosis and the clinical prognosis of breast cancer patients is indistinct. Hence, novel pyroptosis-related biomarkers and their contributing factors deserve further exploration to predict the prognosis in breast cancer. Methods: Pearson's correlation analysis, and univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis were utilized to obtain six optimal pyroptosis-related gene prognostic signatures (Pyro-GPS). The risk score of each breast cancer patient was calculated. Next, a Pyro-GPS risk model was constructed and verified in TCGA cohort (n=1,089) and GSE20711 cohort (n=88). Then analyses of immune microenvironment, genomic variation, functional enrichment, drug response and clinicopathologic feature stratification associated with the risk score of Pyro-GPS were performed. Subsequently, a nomogram based on the risk score and several significant clinicopathologic features was established. Ultimately, we further investigated the role of Results: The low-risk breast cancer patients have better survival outcomes than the high-risk patients. The low-risk patients also show higher immune cell infiltration levels and immune-oncology target expression levels. There is no significant difference in genetic variation between the two risk groups, but the frequency of gene mutations varies. Functional enrichment analysis shows that the low-risk patients are prominently correlated with immune-related pathways, whereas the high-risk patients are enriched in cell cycle, ubiquitination, mismatch repair, homologous recombination and biosynthesis-related pathways. Pyro-GPS is positively correlated with the IC50 of anti-tumor drugs. Furthermore, comprehensive analyses based on risk score and clinicopathological features were performed to predict the prognosis of breast cancer patients. Additionally, Conclusions: The risk score of Pyro-GPS can serve as a promising hallmark to predict the prognosis of BRCA patients. Risk score evaluation may assist to acquire relevant information of tumor immune microenvironment, genomic mutation status, functional pathways and drug sensitivity, and thus provide more effective personalized strategies.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsChemokine CCL5Tumor MicroenvironmentFemaleGenomicsHumansMutationPrognosisCCL5 protein, humanChemokine CCL5breast cancerdrug sensitivitygenomic mutationin vitro experiment targeted CCL5protein ubiquitinationpyroptosispyroptotic gene prognostic signaturestumor immune microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID36090993
PMCPMC9453314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.