ArticleIJU case reports2022
Retroperitoneal myofibroblastoma in an 88-year-old male.
Article in IJU case reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Diagnosis and Management of a Mammary Myofibroblastoma in a Male with a History of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Case Report.Hematology reports · 2026Article
- Editorial Comment to Retroperitoneal myofibroblastoma in an 88-year-old male.IJU case reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Extramammary myofibroblastomas are extremely rare. Case presentation: The patient was an 88-year-old male. He presented for evaluation of frequent urination and a "pushing up" sensation from the groin during defecation. Thorough physical and radiographic examinations revealed a retroperitoneal tumor on the right side of the rectum. The pathologic examination of the biopsy tissue showed that the tumor was unlikely to be malignant. Nevertheless, the patient was symptomatic and thus underwent a laparoscopic tumor resection through a transperitoneal approach. The tumor was circumscribed with a solid capsule. Based on the pathologic findings, which included immunostaining, the tumor was diagnosed as a myofibroblastoma. There was no evidence of a recurrence 6 months postoperatively. Conclusion: We present this case with the clinical course and surgical findings, and discuss the possibility of establishing a preoperative pathologic diagnosis of a myofibroblastoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.