ArticleFrontiers in neurology2022
The application value of CT radiomics features in predicting pressure amplitude correlation index in patients with severe traumatic brain injury.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Current applications of radiomics in neurotrauma.Neurosurgical review · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To explore the application value of a machine learning model based on CT radiomics features in predicting the pressure amplitude correlation index (RAP) in patients with severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI). Methods: Retrospectively analyzed the clinical and imaging data in 36 patients with sTBI. All patients underwent surgical treatment, continuous ICP monitoring, and invasive arterial pressure monitoring. The pressure amplitude correlation index (RAP) was collected within 1 h after surgery. Three volume of interest (VOI) was selected from the craniocerebral CT images of patients 1 h after surgery, and a total of 93 radiomics features were extracted from each VOI. Three models were established to be used to evaluate the patients' RAP levels. The accuracy, precision, recall rate, F1 score, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and area under the curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the predictive performance of each model. Results: The optimal number of features for three predicting models of RAP was five, respectively. The accuracy of predicting the model of the hippocampus was 77.78%, precision was 88.24%, recall rate was 60%, the F1 score was 0.6, and AUC was 0.88. The accuracy of predicting the model of the brainstem was 63.64%, precision was 58.33%, the recall rate was 60%, the F1 score was 0.54, and AUC was 0.82. The accuracy of predicting the model of the thalamus was 81.82%, precision was 88.89%, recall rate was 75%, the F1 score was 0.77, and AUC was 0.96. Conclusions: CT radiomics can predict RAP levels in patients with sTBI, which has the potential to establish a method of non-invasive intracranial pressure (NI-ICP) monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.