ArticlePostepy dermatologii i alergologii2022
Abdominal and pelvic imaging in the diagnosis of acute abdominal attacks in patients with hereditary angioedema due to C1-inhibitor deficiency.
Article in Postepy dermatologii i alergologii, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical features of hereditary angioedema involving the gastrointestinal tract: A retrospective analysis.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2026Article
- Hereditary angioedema diagnosis: Reflecting on the past, envisioning the future.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2025Review
- Another Crohn's Disease Mimicker: A Case of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor-Induced Intestinal Angioedema.ACG case reports journal · 2025Article
- Recurrent Intestinal Angioedema with Normal C1-Inhibitor: A Case Report.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Hereditary angioedema presented as isolated ascending and transverse colon swelling mimicking acute abdomen.SAGE open medical case reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare inherited autosomal dominant disease caused by deficiency or dysfunction of C1 inhibitor (C1INH). Clinical symptoms include recurrent subcutaneous and submucosal angioedema of the internal organs. Abdominal attacks affect more than 90% of patients, are often misdiagnosed and result in unnecessary surgical procedures. Aim: To analyse the utility of imaging studies (USG, CT) in patients with C1INH-HAE during an abdominal attack and remission. Material and methods: We enrolled 40 patients with type I and II HAE (30 women, 10 men; mean age 39 years). The diagnosis of C1INH-HAE was based on patient and family history, significantly reduced values of C1INH serum level and activity. Abdominal and pelvic ultrasound were performed in patients within the first 6 h of the abdominal attack and repeated during remission. Moreover, 23 cases underwent abdominal or pelvic computed tomography during acute abdominal symptoms. The most common ultrasound and CT findings showed the transient presence of a significant amount of fluid in the free abdominal cavity and intestinal oedema during the symptom progression and spontaneously disappearing during the seizure in 90% and 50% of patients, respectively. CT revealed also an enlargement of the mesenteric lymph nodes as well as a fat stranding along the bowel wall thickening. Conclusions: Ultrasound or CT imaging facilitates the diagnosis of the patient suspected of having an abdominal attack due to C1INH-HAE. They allow to identify transitional presence of an abundant fluid in the free abdominal cavity and intestinal swelling which spontaneously disappear with a symptoms attack.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.