ArticleTranslational lung cancer research2022
The improved success rate and reduced complications of a novel localization device
Article in Translational lung cancer research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- CT-guided coaxial four-hook localization improves precision and efficiency in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a retrospective study.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Preoperative computed tomography guided coil versus suture hook-wire localization for multiple pulmonary nodules.World journal of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- A novel localization technique for margin distance assessment of deep-seated small pulmonary nodules in thoracoscopic wedge resection: a retrospective study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Robotic-assisted CT-guided percutaneous pulmonary nodules localization by hook-wire needles: a retrospective observational study.Journal of thoracic disease · 2024Article
- Computed tomography-guided hookwire localization and medical glue combined with methylene blue localization for pulmonary nodules before video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a single-center, retrospective study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Background: In our previous study, we developed a 4-hook claw-suture localization device for pulmonary nodule resection, which acheived satifisfactory results. Following this, we conducted this single-center, open-label, randomized clinical trial to compare the success rate and complication rate of this novel localization device and currently widely-used hookwire. Methods: Patients with small pulmonary nodules (0.4-1 cm) who received preoperative localization and thoracoscopic resection at Shanghai Chest Hospital were randomly assigned (1:2 ratio, via computer-generated randomized numbers) to undergo localization using either a novel claw-suture system (claw group) or classical (hookwire group) localization device. The primary endpoint of this study was localization success rate, and the secondary endpoints included complications, localization-related time, and pain. Results: A total of 411 patients were randomly assigned to the claw group (n=136) or the hookwire group (n=275) before thoracoscopic resection of small pulmonary nodules and analyzed. Compared with the hookwire group, the claw group had a significantly higher success rate (133/136, 97.8% Conclusions: The new claw-suture localization device is superior to traditional hookwire, with a higher success rate, fewer complications, and better patient tolerance for preoperative localization of small pulmonary nodules. Trial Registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR1900027346.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.