ArticleStatistical analysis and data mining2022
Regression-Based Bayesian Estimation and Structure Learning for Nonparanormal Graphical Models.
Article in Statistical analysis and data mining, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Psychosocial hierarchies of modifiable risk for Alzheimer's disease: A networks analysis.PloS one · 2026Article
- Monte Carlo inference for semiparametric Bayesian regression.Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2025Article
- Regression-Based Bayesian Estimation and Structure Learning for Nonparanormal Graphical Models.Statistical analysis and data mining · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A nonparanormal graphical model is a semiparametric generalization of a Gaussian graphical model for continuous variables in which it is assumed that the variables follow a Gaussian graphical model only after some unknown smooth monotone transformations. We consider a Bayesian approach to inference in a nonparanormal graphical model in which we put priors on the unknown transformations through a random series based on B-splines. We use a regression formulation to construct the likelihood through the Cholesky decomposition on the underlying precision matrix of the transformed variables and put shrinkage priors on the regression coefficients. We apply a plug-in variational Bayesian algorithm for learning the sparse precision matrix and compare the performance to a posterior Gibbs sampling scheme in a simulation study. We finally apply the proposed methods to a microarray data set. The proposed methods have better performance as the dimension increases, and in particular, the variational Bayesian approach has the potential to speed up the estimation in the Bayesian nonparanormal graphical model without the Gaussianity assumption while retaining the information to construct the graph.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.