Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36090616›Full record

ArticleRemote sensing of environment2022

Multi-sensor spectral synergies for crop stress detection and monitoring in the optical domain: A review.

Katja Berger, Miriam Machwitz, Marlena Kycko, Shawn C Kefauver, Shari Van Wittenberghe, Max Gerhards, Jochem Verrelst, Clement Atzberger, Christiaan van der Tol, Alexander Damm and 28 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Remote sensing of environment, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
36.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 231 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

38 authors at 20 institutions in 14 countries.

Katja BergerImage Processing Laboratory (IPL), University of Valencia, C/Catedrático José Beltrán 2, Paterna 46980, Valencia, Spain.
Miriam MachwitzRemote Sensing and Natural Resources Modelling Group, Environmental Research and Innovation Department, Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology (LIST), 41, rue du Brill, L-4422 Belvaux, Luxembourg.
Marlena KyckoDepartment of Geoinformatics Cartography and Remote Sensing, Chair of Geomatics and Information Systems, Faculty of Geography and Regional Studies, University of Warsaw, 00-927 Warszawa, Poland.
Shawn C KefauverIntegrative Crop Ecophysiology Group, Plant Physiology Section, Faculty of Biology, University of Barcelona, 08028 Barcelona, Spain.
Shari Van WittenbergheImage Processing Laboratory (IPL), University of Valencia, C/Catedrático José Beltrán 2, Paterna 46980, Valencia, Spain.
Max GerhardsEarth Observation and Climate Processes, Trier University, 54286 Trier, Germany.
Jochem VerrelstImage Processing Laboratory (IPL), University of Valencia, C/Catedrático José Beltrán 2, Paterna 46980, Valencia, Spain.
Clement AtzbergerInstitute of Geomatics, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna (BOKU), Peter Jordan Str. 82, 1190 Vienna, Austria.
Christiaan van der TolFaculty Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation, ITC, University of Twente, the Netherlands.
Alexander DammDepartment of Geography, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland.
Uwe RascherInstitute of Bio- and Geosciences, Plant Sciences (IBG-2), Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52428 Jülich, Germany.
Ittai HerrmannThe Plant Sensing Laboratory, The Robert H. Smith Institute for Plant Sciences and Genetics in Agriculture, The Robert H. Smith Faculty of Agriculture, Food and Environment, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, P.O. Box 12, Rehovot 7610001, Israel.
Veronica Sobejano PazDepartment of Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
Sven FahrnerInstitute of Bio- and Geosciences, Plant Sciences (IBG-2), Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52428 Jülich, Germany.
Roland PieruschkaInstitute of Bio- and Geosciences, Plant Sciences (IBG-2), Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52428 Jülich, Germany.
Egor PrikaziukFaculty Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation, ITC, University of Twente, the Netherlands.
Ma Luisa BuchaillotIntegrative Crop Ecophysiology Group, Plant Physiology Section, Faculty of Biology, University of Barcelona, 08028 Barcelona, Spain.
Andrej HalabukInstitute of Landscape Ecology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, 814 99 Bratislava, Slovakia.
Marco CelestiHE Space for ESA - European Space Agency, European Space Research and Technology Centre (ESA-ESTEC), Keplerlaan 1, 2201, AZ Noordwijk, the Netherlands.
Gerbrand KorenCopernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Esra Tunc GormusDepartment of Geomatics Engineering, Karadeniz Technical University, 61080 Trabzon, Turkey.
Micol RossiniRemote Sensing of Environmental Dynamics Laboratory (LTDA), University of Milano - Bicocca, Piazza della Scienza 1, 20126 Milano, Italy.
Michael FoersterGeoinformation in Environmental Planning Lab, Technische Universität Berlin, 10623 Berlin, Germany.
Bastian SiegmannInstitute of Bio- and Geosciences, Plant Sciences (IBG-2), Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52428 Jülich, Germany.
Asmaa AbdelbakiEarth Observation and Climate Processes, Trier University, 54286 Trier, Germany.
Giulia TagliabueRemote Sensing of Environmental Dynamics Laboratory (LTDA), University of Milano - Bicocca, Piazza della Scienza 1, 20126 Milano, Italy.
Tobias HankDepartment of Geography, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU), Luisenstr. 37, 80333 Munich, Germany.
Roshanak DarvishzadehFaculty Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation, ITC, University of Twente, the Netherlands.
Helge AasenEarth Observation and Analysis of Agroecosystems Team, Division Agroecology and Environment, Agroscope, Zurich, Switzerland.
Monica GarciaResearch Centre for the Management of Agricultural and Environmental Risks (CEIGRAM), ETSIAAB, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040, Spain.
Isabel PôçasForestWISE - Collaborative Laboratory for Integrated Forest & Fire Management, Quinta de Prados, Campus da UTAD, 5001-801 Vila Real, Portugal.
Subhajit BandopadhyayDepartment of Geography and Environmental Science, University of Southampton, UK.
Mauro SulisRemote Sensing and Natural Resources Modelling Group, Environmental Research and Innovation Department, Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology (LIST), 41, rue du Brill, L-4422 Belvaux, Luxembourg.
Enrico TomelleriFaculty of Science and Technology, Free University of Bozen/Bolzano, Italy.
Offer RozensteinInstitute of Soil, Water and Environmental Sciences, Agricultural Research Organization-Volcani Institute, HaMaccabim Road 68, P.O. Box 15159, Rishon LeZion 7528809, Israel.
Lachezar FilchevSpace Research and Technology Institute, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences (SRTI-BAS), Bulgaria.
Gheorghe StancileNational Meteorological Administration, Building A, Soseaua Bucuresti-Ploiesti 97, 013686 Bucuresti, Romania.
Martin SchlerfRemote Sensing and Natural Resources Modelling Group, Environmental Research and Innovation Department, Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology (LIST), 41, rue du Brill, L-4422 Belvaux, Luxembourg.
Parc Científic de la Universitat de València · ESForschungszentrum Jülich · DELuxembourg Institute of Science and Technology · LUUniversity of Twente · NLBulgarian Academy of Sciences · BGLudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEUniversitat de Barcelona · ESUniversität Trier · DEUniversity of Milano-Bicocca · ITAgroscope · CHBOKU University · ATEuropean Space Research and Technology Centre · NLHebrew University of Jerusalem · ILInstitute of Landscape Ecology of the Slovak Academy of Sciences · SKKaradeniz Technical University · TRTechnical University of Denmark · DKTechnische Universität Berlin · DEUniversidad Politécnica de Madrid · ESUniversity of Southampton · GBUniversity of Warsaw · PL

Funding

European Research Council 755617
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Remote detection and monitoring of the vegetation responses to stress became relevant for sustainable agriculture. Ongoing developments in optical remote sensing technologies have provided tools to increase our understanding of stress-related physiological processes. Therefore, this study aimed to provide an overview of the main spectral technologies and retrieval approaches for detecting crop stress in agriculture. Firstly, we present integrated views on: i) biotic and abiotic stress factors, the phases of stress, and respective plant responses, and ii) the affected traits, appropriate spectral domains and corresponding methods for measuring traits remotely. Secondly, representative results of a systematic literature analysis are highlighted, identifying the current status and possible future trends in stress detection and monitoring. Distinct plant responses occurring under shortterm, medium-term or severe chronic stress exposure can be captured with remote sensing due to specific light interaction processes, such as absorption and scattering manifested in the reflected radiance, i.e. visible (VIS), near infrared (NIR), shortwave infrared, and emitted radiance, i.e. solar-induced fluorescence and thermal infrared (TIR). From the analysis of 96 research papers, the following trends can be observed: increasing usage of satellite and unmanned aerial vehicle data in parallel with a shift in methods from simpler parametric approaches towards more advanced physically-based and hybrid models. Most study designs were largely driven by sensor availability and practical economic reasons, leading to the common usage of VIS-NIR-TIR sensor combinations. The majority of reviewed studies compared stress proxies calculated from single-source sensor domains rather than using data in a synergistic way. We identified new ways forward as guidance for improved synergistic usage of spectral domains for stress detection: (1) combined acquisition of data from multiple sensors for analysing multiple stress responses simultaneously (holistic view); (2) simultaneous retrieval of plant traits combining multi-domain radiative transfer models and machine learning methods; (3) assimilation of estimated plant traits from distinct spectral domains into integrated crop growth models. As a future outlook, we recommend combining multiple remote sensing data streams into crop model assimilation schemes to build up Digital Twins of agroecosystems, which may provide the most efficient way to detect the diversity of environmental and biotic stresses and thus enable respective management decisions.

Indexed as

Precision agriculture multi-modal solar-induced fluorescence satellite hyperspectral multispectral biotic and abiotic stress

Identifiers

PMID36090616
PMCPMC7613382
OpenAlexW4289792395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.