ArticleChildren and youth services review2021
Predictors of condom use among system-involved youth: The importance of Sex Ed.
Article in Children and youth services review, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- In the Know: A Cluster Randomized Trial of an In-person Sexual Health Education Program Integrating Digital Technologies for Adolescents.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2024Trial
- A Socioecological Perspective on Sexual Health Promotion Choices Among Youth At-Risk for and Living with HIV in Los Angeles and New Orleans.AIDS and behavior · 2026Article
- Innovation to Impact: Introduction to the Special Issue on Evidence from the Teen Pregnancy Prevention Program Experiment with Innovation.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Sexual health education has been proven effective in improving adolescent sexual reproductive health outcomes. System-involved youth, including those in child welfare or juvenile justice systems, experience disproportionately poor outcomes as compared to youth in the general population, especially concerning STIs and early or unplanned pregnancies. Using logistic regression, this cross-sectional study examined the odds of condom use in a sample (n = 318; 61.3% males; 79.9% African American) of system-involved youth with multiple high-risk sexual behaviors. Specifically, it examined the impact of sexual health education, attitudes and beliefs about condoms, and the moderating effect of gender. The logistic regression models showed that youth were more likely to use a condom when exposed to comprehensive sexual health education (p < .05). Beliefs about condom effectiveness increased the odds of condom use in the second model (p < .01). Gender was not found to have a moderating effect. This study examined whether receiving comprehensive sexual health education and adolescent attitudes and beliefs towards condoms were associated with non-condom use using logistic regression in a sample of system-involved youth. Results suggest that comprehensive sexual health education could improve condom use in this vulnerable population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.