ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2022
Comparative analysis of cystic biliary atresia and choledochal cysts.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- The diagnostic performance of ultrasound features for biliary atresia: a systematic review and updated meta-analysis.Pediatric surgery international · 2025Pooled it
- A prognostic analysis of cystic and non-cystic biliary atresia.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Key postnatal magnetic resonance characteristics for differentiating cystic biliary atresia from choledochal cyst.European radiology · 2024Article
- A narrative review of genes associated with liver fibrosis in biliary atresia.Translational pediatrics · 2024Review
- Outcomes of sonographically-suspected fetal intra-abdominal cysts: Surgical intervention, conservative management and spontaneous regression.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Cystic biliary atresia (CBA) is a rare and peculiar type of biliary atresia (BA) that is easily confused with infantile choledochal cysts (CCs). This study explored information for early CBA diagnosis and treatment. Method: The authors retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 32 children with hilar cysts from January 2013 to May 2021. According to the diagnosis, they were divided into the CBA ( Results: The alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, total bilirubin, and direct bilirubin levels in the CBA group were higher than in the CCs group ( Conclusion: For children with early-onset severe jaundice, and if the width of the cystic mass was ≤2.5 cm, a diagnosis of CBA was highly likely. Early cholangiography and surgical treatment are necessary for the effective treatment of these infants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.