ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2022
Clinical evaluation of acute necrotizing encephalopathy in children.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Initiation of tocilizumab within 24 hours in acute necrotizing encephalopathy is related to a good outcome: a systematic review.Journal of neurology · 2025Pooled it
- Predictive value of ANE-SS combined with ferritin and DIC scores for mortality Risk in children with acute necrotizing encephalopathy.Translational pediatrics · 2025Article
- A rare and devastating etiology of febrile seizure.Annals of the Child Neurology Society · 2024Article
- Identification of neurological complications in childhood influenza: a random forest model.BMC pediatrics · 2024Article
- Evaluation of white matter microstructural alterations in premature infants with necrotizing enterocolitis.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Acute necrotizing encephalopathy (ANE) is a rare but severe encephalopathy and is associated with a high morbidity and mortality. We aimed to analyze and compare the clinical features and predictive indicators of pediatric ANE. Materials and methods: This retrospective study included children with ANE diagnosed at Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center between November 2018 and January 2020. Pediatric patients' information, including clinical characteristics, laboratory tests, neuroelectrophysiology and brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings, MRI score, brainstem auditory evoked potential (BAEP) grades, ANE severity scores (ANE-SS), and modified Rankin scale (mRS), were collected. Results: Twelve ANE patients were included. Among them, one patient (8.3%) died from brainstem dysfunction, one (8.3%) recovered and 10 (83.3%) experienced neurological sequelae. All patients had an initial viral infection and neurological symptoms such as acute disturbance of consciousness (ADOC) or seizure, and the interval from onset of the disease to neurological manifestations was 3 (1.25-3) days. MRI score-I ranged from 1 to 3 (1.8 ± 0.7), MRI score-II ranged from 1 to 4 (2.5 ± 1.1). ANE-SS varied from 1 to 6 (3.9 ± 1.3). The scores of mRS were from 0 to 6 (2.9 ± 1.7). Higher MRI score were associated with worse outcomes, while the BAEP grade and ANE-SS score were not significantly associated with mRS. Conclusion: ANE is a severe encephalopathy syndrome with rapid progression, resulting in serious neurological sequelae. Compared with BAEP grade and ANE-SS, brain MRI shows more comprehensive advantages in predicting the prognosis of ANE patients. More in-depth research and better indicators are still needed to support the evaluation and treatment of ANE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.