ArticleEClinicalMedicine2022
Crowdsourcing interventions to promote uptake of COVID-19 booster vaccines.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effectiveness of a video-based intervention for COVID-19 vaccine acceptance among individuals with mental disorders: a randomized online experiment.Frontiers in public health · 2026Trial
- Financial Incentives for COVID-19 Vaccination: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2025Trial
- Loss-framing of information and pre-vaccination consultation improve COVID-19 vaccine acceptance: A survey experiment.Frontiers in public health · 2023Trial
- Personalized feedback about immunity corrects risk misestimation and motivates vaccination.PNAS nexus · 2026Article
- The effect of mobile phone messaging to support COVID-19 vaccination in Colombia: A randomized controlled clinical trial.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- [Enlightenment through official vaccination communication: an experimental study comparing evidence-based fact boxes with nudges and advertising].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2025Article
- Psychological reactance to system-level policies before and after their implementation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- How to (or how not to) implement crowdsourcing for the development of health interventions: lessons learned from four African countries.Health policy and planning · 2024Article
- Review
- Policy makers believe money motivates more than it does.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Crowdsourcing as a tool for creating effective nudges: An example for financial oversubscription.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
- Drivers of COVID-19 booster uptake among nurses.American journal of infection control · 2023Article
- Different Interventions for COVID-19 Primary and Booster Vaccination? Effects of Psychological Factors and Health Policies on Vaccine Uptake.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2023Article
- A call for immediate action to increase COVID-19 vaccination uptake to prepare for the third pandemic winter.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Exploring the impact of Quebec's vaccine lottery and vaccine passports on Covid-19 vaccination intention: Findings from repeated cross-sectional surveys.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2022Article
- Barriers and facilitators to the future uptake of regular COVID-19 booster vaccinations among young adults in the UK.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2022Article
- Payments and freedoms: Effects of monetary and legal incentives on COVID-19 vaccination intentions in Germany.PloS one · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: COVID-19 booster vaccine uptake rates are behind the rate of primary vaccination in many countries. Governments and non-governmental institutions rely on a range of interventions aiming to increase booster uptake. Yet, little is known how experts and the general public evaluate these interventions. Methods: We applied a novel crowdsourcing approach to provide rapid insights on the most promising interventions to promote uptake of COVID-19 booster vaccines. In the first phase (December 2021), international experts ( Findings: Sanctions were evaluated as potentially most effective but least accepted. Evaluations by expert and general population samples were considerably aligned. Interventions that received the most positive evaluations regarding both effectiveness and acceptability across evaluation groups were: a day off work after getting vaccinated, financial incentives, tax benefits, promotional campaigns, and mobile vaccination teams. Interpretation: The results provide useful insights to help governmental and non-governmental institutions in their decisions about which interventions to implement. Additionally, the applied crowdsourcing method may be used in future studies to retrieve rapid insights on the comparative evaluation of (health) policies. Funding: This study received funding from the Austrian Science Fund (SFB F63) and the University of Vienna.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.