ReviewRSC advances2022
A study of bioactive glass-ceramic's mechanical properties, apatite formation, and medical applications.
Review in RSC advances, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trends and Future Perspectives in Additive Modifications of Calcium Silicate-Based Cements: A Scoping Review (2015-2024).Australian endodontic journal : the journal of the Australian Society of Endodontology Inc · 2026Article
- Sequential crystallization pathways in apatite-wollastonite glass-ceramicsRSC advances · 2026Article
- Biodegradable (PLGA) Implants in Pediatric Trauma: A Brief Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Study of New Glass-Ceramic and Dense Ceramic Containing Biogenic Hydroxyapatite.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Bioresorption and Biomineralization of S53P4 Bioactive Glass in Neutral Tris Buffer and Citric Acid Solution.ACS omega · 2024Article
- Fabrication Strategies for Bioceramic Scaffolds in Bone Tissue Engineering with Generative Design Applications.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Bioactive ceramic-based materials: beneficial properties and potential applications in dental repair and regeneration.Regenerative medicine · 2024Review
- Dual-core-component multiphasic bioceramic granules with selective-area porous structures facilitating bone tissue regeneration and repair.RSC advances · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Apparently, bioactive glass-ceramics are made by doing a number of steps, such as creating a microstructure from dispersed crystals within the residual glass, which provides high bending strength, and apatite crystallizes on surfaces of glass-ceramics when calcium ions are present in the blood. Apatite crystals grow on the glass and ceramic surfaces due to the hydrated silica. These materials are biocompatible with living bone in a matter of weeks, don't weaken mechanically or histologically, and exhibit good osteointegration as well as mechanical properties that are therapeutically relevant, such as fracture toughness and flexural strength. As part of this study, we examined mechanical properties, process mechanisms involved in apatite formation, and potential applications for bioactive glass-ceramic in orthopedic surgery, including load-bearing devices.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.