ReviewFrontiers in psychiatry2022
Toward a dual process model of moral injury and traumatic illness.
Review in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Healing the Moral Self: Al-Ghazālī's Psychology of the Heart and Moral Injury, with Implications for Muslim Mental Health and Spiritual Care in Indonesia.Journal of religion and health · 2026Article
- Towards an Extended Cognitive Model of Moral Injury-The Role of Mental Defeat.Scandinavian journal of psychology · 2026Review
- Upholding Human Dignity as a First Principle: Preventive Moral Injury Work in NATO Chaplaincy.Journal of religion and health · 2026Article
- Moral Injury as a Wound of Meaning and Conscience: An Introductory Synthesis of Conceptual Foundations, Spiritual Dimensions, and Clinical Implications.Journal of religion and health · 2026Article
- A Journey of Necessity: Moral Injury in Light of the Divine Comedy.Journal of religion and health · 2026Article
- Editorial: The cost of war: sociological approaches to the societal and individual wounds of Combat.Frontiers in sociology · 2025Article
- Moral trauma, moral distress, moral injury, and moral injury disorder: definitions and assessments.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- The 3T model of military veteran radicalization and extremism: exploring risk factors and protective strategies.Frontiers in sociology · 2025Article
- Preserving the human character in an inhuman situation: the contributions and meanings of military soul care in the Swedish armed forces.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- What is veteran suicide prevention really about? Questions from the community to researchers.Qualitative research in medicine & healthcare · 2024Article
- Evil, Constructed: A Salient Part of an Emerging Spiritual Veteran Identity.The journal of pastoral care & counseling : JPCC · 2023Article
- Moral injury symptoms and related problems among service members and Veterans: A network analysis.Journal of military, veteran and family health · 2023Article
- Moral injury: understanding Swedish veterans who are assessed but not diagnosed with PTSD.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2023Article
- Caught between is and ought: The Moral Dissonance Model.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Moral injury has emerged as a topic of significant research and clinical interest over the last decade. However, much work remains to be done to comprehensively define the moral injury construct, with implications for understanding the etiology and maintenance of moral injury, its symptoms, associations with and distinctions from traumatic illness, and treatment approaches. We provide a brief overview of the existing moral injury literature and introduce a novel dual process model (DPM) of moral injury and traumatic illness. The DPM posits an event exposure which may satisfy DSM-5 posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) criterion A, potential morally injurious event (PMIE) criteria, or both, followed by individual role appraisal as a perpetrator through action or inaction, a witness, a victim, or a combination of the these. Role appraisal influences symptoms and processes across biological, psychological, behavioral, social, spiritual/religious, as well as values, character, and identity domains to support a label of traumatic illness, moral injury, or both. The DPM provides a flexible analytical framework for evaluating symptoms associated with moral injury and traumatic stress and has important implications for treatment. The most thoroughly reviewed evidence-based interventions for traumatic stress hinge on exposure and habituation mechanisms to manage dysregulation of fear and memory systems, but these mechanisms often do not address core domains of moral injury identified in the DPM, including spiritual, religious, values, character, and identity domains as these exist largely outside of the putative fear network. We provide brief vignettes to illustrate the practical application of the DPM and argue that adjunct and stand-alone approaches which address values and character domains, leveraging principles of Stoicism, non-judgment of experience, acceptance, and values-oriented action, are more likely than traditional trauma treatment approaches to positively affect moral injury symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.