ArticleFrontiers in surgery2022
A predictive model based on ground glass nodule features
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial intelligence-measured nodule mass for determining the invasiveness of neoplastic ground glass nodules.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
- Article
- [Establishment and Verification of Benign and Malignant Prediction Model of Subcentimeter Pulmonary Ground Glass Nodules Based on HRCT].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-10-13Compromised Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The morphology of ground-glass nodule (GGN) under high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) has been suggested to indicate different histological subtypes of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD); however, existing studies only include the limited number of GGN characteristics, which lacks a systematic model for predicting invasive LUAD. This study aimed to construct a predictive model based on GGN features under HRCT for LUAD. Methods: A total of 301 surgical LUAD patients with HRCT-confirmed GGN were enrolled, and their GGN-related features were assessed by 2 individual radiologists. The pathological diagnosis of the invasive LUAD was established by pathologic examination following surgery (including 171 invasive and 130 non-invasive LUAD patients). Results: GGN features including shorter distance from pleura, larger diameter, area and mean CT attenuation, more heterogeneous uniformity of density, irregular shape, coarse margin, not defined nodule-lung interface, spiculation, pleural indentation, air bronchogram, vacuole sign, vessel changes, lobulation were observed in invasive LUAD patients compared with non-invasive LUAD patients. After adjustment by multivariate logistic regression model, GGN diameter (OR = 1.490, 95% CI, 1.326-1.674), mean CT attenuation (OR = 1.007, 95% CI, 1.004-1.011) and heterogeneous uniformity of density (OR = 3.009, 95% CI, 1.485-6.094) were independent risk factors for invasive LUAD. In addition, a predictive model integrating these three independent GGN features was established (named as invasion of lung adenocarcinoma by GGN features (ILAG)), and receiver-operating characteristic curve illustrated that the ILAG model presented good predictive value for invasive LUAD (AUC: 0.919, 95% CI, 0.889-0.949). Conclusions: ILAG predictive model integrating GGN diameter, mean CT attenuation and heterogeneous uniformity of density
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.