Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36090321›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in surgery2022

Influence of different fixation modes on biomechanical conduction of 3D printed prostheses for treating critical diaphyseal defects of lower limbs: A finite element study.

Bingchuan Liu, Yang Lv, Xingcai Li, Zhongjun Liu, Yufeng Zheng, Peng Wen, Ning Liu, Yaping Huo, Fang Zhou, Yun Tian

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Bingchuan LiuDepartment of Orthopaedics, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yang LvDepartment of Orthopaedics, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xingcai LiDepartment of Orthopaedics, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Zhongjun LiuDepartment of Orthopaedics, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yufeng ZhengSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Peng WenDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Ning LiuR&D Center, AK Medical Co., Ltd., Beijing, China.
Yaping HuoR&D Center, AK Medical Co., Ltd., Beijing, China.
Fang ZhouDepartment of Orthopaedics, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yun TianDepartment of Orthopaedics, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Peking University · CNPeking University Third Hospital · CNTsinghua University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Applying 3D printed prostheses to repair diaphyseal defects of lower limbs has been clinically conducted in orthopedics. However, there is still no unified reference standard for which the prosthesis design and fixation mode are more conducive to appropriate biomechanical conduction. Methods: We built five different types of prosthesis designs and fixation modes, from Mode I to Mode V. Finite element analysis (FEA) was used to study and compare the mechanical environments of overall bone-prosthesis structure, and the maximum stress concentration were recorded. Additionally, by comparing the maximum von Mises stress of bone, intramedullary (IM) nail, screw, and prosthesis with their intrinsic yield strength, the risk of fixation failure was further clarified. Results: In the modes in which the prosthesis was fixed by an interlocking IM nail (Mode I and Mode IV), the stress mainly concentrated at the distal bone-prosthesis interface and the middle-distal region of nail. When a prosthesis with integrally printed IM nail and lateral wings was implanted (Mode II), the stress mainly concentrated at the bone-prosthesis junctional region. For cases with partially lateral defects, the prosthesis with integrally printed wings mainly played a role in reconstructing the structural integrity of bone, but had a weak role in sharing the stress conduction (Mode V). The maximum von Mises stress of both the proximal and distal tibia appeared in Mode III, which were 18.5 and 47.1 MPa. The maximum peak stress shared by the prosthesis, screws and IM nails appeared in Mode II, III and I, which were 51.8, 87.2, and 101.8 MPa, respectively. These peak stresses were all lower than the yield strength of the materials themselves. Thus, the bending and breakage of both bone and implants were unlikely to happen. Conclusion: For the application of 3D printed prostheses to repair diaphyseal defects, different fixation modes will lead to the change of biomechanical environment. Interlocking IM nail fixation is beneficial to uniform stress conduction, and conducive to new bone regeneration in the view of biomechanical point. All five modes we established have reliable biomechanical safety.

Indexed as

3D printing technologybiomechanical characteristicsdiaphyseal bone defectfinite element analysisfixation mode

Identifiers

PMID36090321
PMCPMC9448880
OpenAlexW4292878050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.