Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36090310›Full record

ArticleCommunity, work & family2019

Involuntary vs. Voluntary Flexible Work: Insights for Scholars and Stakeholders.

Anne Kaduk, Katie Genadek, Erin L Kelly, Phyllis Moen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Community, work & family, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Psychosocial working conditions and mental well-being of remote and stationary employees: a longitudinal study.International journal of occupational medicine and environmental health · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anne KadukIndependent Scholar, Palo Alto, United States.
Katie GenadekUniversity of Colorado, Boulder, United States.
Erin L KellyMIT, Cambridge, United States.
Phyllis MoenUniversity of Minnesota, Sociology, 909 SSB, 267 19th Ave S, Minneapolis, 55455 United States.

Funding

Workplace Policies and Practices Coordinating CenterU01HD051276 · NICHD · RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE · PI KARUNTZOS, GEORGIA TRYPHON · 2005 to 2013
$10.4M
Family Responsive Workplaces &Low-Wage Employee HealthU01AG027669 · NIA · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (SCH OF PUBLIC HLTH) · PI BERKMAN, LISA F · 2005 to 2012
$7.5M
Flexible Work and Well-Being Center at the University of MinnesotaU01HD051256 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI KELLY, ERIN L. · 2005 to 2013
$6.7M
Work , Stress, Health &Parenting Among Hotel EmployeesU01HD051217 · NICHD · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY-UNIV PARK · PI ALMEIDA, DAVID M. · 2005 to 2013
$5.7M
Center for Work-Family Stress, Safety & Health: Portland State University RUU01HD059773 · NICHD · PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY · PI HAMMER, LESLIE · 2008 to 2012
$4.5M
Health Consequences of Workplace Policies/Practices-CCU01HD051218 · NICHD · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI HANSON, GINGER C. · 2005 to 2013
$3.0M
NIA NIH HHS U01 AG027669NICHD NIH HHS U01 HD051217NICHD NIH HHS U01 HD051218NICHD NIH HHS U01 HD051256NICHD NIH HHS U01 HD051276NICHD NIH HHS U01 HD059773NIOSH CDC HHS U01 OH008788
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Building on insights from the early stages of our research partnership with a U.S. Fortune 500 organization, we came to differentiate between voluntary and involuntary schedule variability and remote work. This differentiation underscores the complexity behind flexible schedules and remote work, especially among white-collar, salaried professionals. We collected survey data among the partner firm's information technology (IT) workforce to evaluate whether these forms of flexibility had different implications for workers, as part of the larger Work, Family, and Health Network Study. We find that a significant minority of these employees report working variable schedules and working at home involuntarily. Additionally, involuntary variable schedules are associated with greater work-to-family conflict, stress, burnout, turnover intentions, and lower job satisfaction in models that adjust for personal characteristics, type of job, work hours, family demands, and other factors. Voluntary remote work, in contrast, is protective and more common in this professional sample. Employees working at least 20% of their hours at home and reporting moderate or high choice over where they work have lower stress and intentions to leave the firm (as well as higher job satisfaction in some models). These findings point to the importance of both stakeholders and scholars distinguishing between voluntary and involuntary forms of flexibility, even in a relatively advantaged professional and technical workforce.

Indexed as

flexible work arrangementsremote workschedule controltelecommutingtranslational researchworkplace flexibility

Identifiers

PMID36090310
PMCPMC9455838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.