Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36090300›Full record

ArticleJID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health2022

Detecting Eczema Areas in Digital Images: An Impossible Task?

Guillem Hurault, Kevin Pan, Ricardo Mokhtari, Bayanne Olabi, Eleanor Earp, Lloyd Steele, Hywel C Williams, Reiko J Tanaka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Current research landscape and future prospects of in silico modeling approaches for atopic dermatitis.JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Development of High-Quality Artificial Intelligence in Dermatology: Guidelines, Pitfalls, and Potential.JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Guillem HuraultDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Kevin PanDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Ricardo MokhtariDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Bayanne OlabiBiosciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, United Kingdom.
Eleanor EarpDepartment of Dermatology, Lauriston Building, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Lloyd SteeleDepartment of Dermatology, The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Hywel C WilliamsBiosciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, United Kingdom.
Reiko J TanakaDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_19040
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Assessing the severity of atopic dermatitis (AD, or eczema) traditionally relies on a face-to-face assessment by healthcare professionals and may suffer from inter- and intra-rater variability. With the expanding role of telemedicine, several machine learning algorithms have been proposed to automatically assess AD severity from digital images. Those algorithms usually detect and then delineate (segment) AD lesions before assessing lesional severity and are trained using the data of AD areas detected by healthcare professionals. To evaluate the reliability of such data, we estimated the inter-rater reliability of AD segmentation in digital images. Four dermatologists independently segmented AD lesions in 80 digital images collected in a published clinical trial. We estimated the inter-rater reliability of the AD segmentation using the intraclass correlation coefficient at the pixel and the area levels for different resolutions of the images. The average intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.45 (

Indexed as

AD, atopic dermatitisICC, intraclass correlation coefficientIRR, inter-rater reliabilityKA, Krippendorff’s alphaML, machine learning

Identifiers

PMID36090300
PMCPMC9460154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.